Table 9
Wage gains from mobility - 1997/1998
|
Job mobility | |||||
|
________No________ |
Yes | ||||
|
Spatial mobility |
Spatial mobility | ||||
|
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes | ||
|
Wage |
(ʌvg) |
0,06 |
0,06 |
0,08 |
0,10 |
|
Hourly wage |
(Avg) |
0,09 |
0,09 |
0,12 |
0,13 |
Source: LMEEM(2000)
By firm size (Table 8), we find higher levels of mobility for smaller firms. Analysing
the wage change from 1997 to 1998 both for the total and hourly wage (table 9) we find
that workers that move have higher wage gains. Workers that change employer increase
the wage by 8% against 6% for stayers and those that change employer and workplace
increase their wage by 10%.
Table 10
Job mobility, spatial mobility and industry mobility
|
Job mobility | |||||
|
______No______ |
Yes | ||||
|
Spatial mobility |
Spatial mobility | ||||
|
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes | ||
|
Moving into a new establishment |
(Total) |
20.862 |
8.607 |
31.201 |
9.999 |
|
Moving out of a closed |
(Total) |
23.665 |
8.641 |
27.990 |
8.913 |
|
Changing industry |
(Total) |
15.565 |
1.108 |
27.680 |
24.963 |
Source: LMEEM(2000)
Trying to specify more the patterns of mobility, Table 10 allows to classifying movers
into those that move into a new establishment, those that move out of a closed
establishment and those that change industry
11
More intriguing information
1. Spatial agglomeration and business groups: new evidence from Italian industrial districts2. Human Rights Violations by the Executive: Complicity of the Judiciary in Cameroon?
3. A production model and maintenance planning model for the process industry
4. Cancer-related electronic support groups as navigation-aids: Overcoming geographic barriers
5. Developing vocational practice in the jewelry sector through the incubation of a new ‘project-object’
6. Smith and Rawls Share a Room
7. The WTO and the Cartagena Protocol: International Policy Coordination or Conflict?
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. A Note on Productivity Change in European Co-operative Banks: The Luenberger Indicator Approach