Table 9
Wage gains from mobility - 1997/1998
Job mobility | |||||
________No________ |
Yes | ||||
Spatial mobility |
Spatial mobility | ||||
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes | ||
Wage |
(ʌvg) |
0,06 |
0,06 |
0,08 |
0,10 |
Hourly wage |
(Avg) |
0,09 |
0,09 |
0,12 |
0,13 |
Source: LMEEM(2000)
By firm size (Table 8), we find higher levels of mobility for smaller firms. Analysing
the wage change from 1997 to 1998 both for the total and hourly wage (table 9) we find
that workers that move have higher wage gains. Workers that change employer increase
the wage by 8% against 6% for stayers and those that change employer and workplace
increase their wage by 10%.
Table 10
Job mobility, spatial mobility and industry mobility
Job mobility | |||||
______No______ |
Yes | ||||
Spatial mobility |
Spatial mobility | ||||
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes | ||
Moving into a new establishment |
(Total) |
20.862 |
8.607 |
31.201 |
9.999 |
Moving out of a closed |
(Total) |
23.665 |
8.641 |
27.990 |
8.913 |
Changing industry |
(Total) |
15.565 |
1.108 |
27.680 |
24.963 |
Source: LMEEM(2000)
Trying to specify more the patterns of mobility, Table 10 allows to classifying movers
into those that move into a new establishment, those that move out of a closed
establishment and those that change industry
11
More intriguing information
1. Human Rights Violations by the Executive: Complicity of the Judiciary in Cameroon?2. The name is absent
3. Gender stereotyping and wage discrimination among Italian graduates
4. The name is absent
5. A Multimodal Framework for Computer Mediated Learning: The Reshaping of Curriculum Knowledge and Learning
6. Structural Breakpoints in Volatility in International Markets
7. The name is absent
8. A Location Game On Disjoint Circles
9. The name is absent
10. Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region