Table 1
Worker mobility 1997/1998
|
Spatial mobility | |||||
|
No |
% |
Yes |
% | ||
|
Job |
No |
1.084.499 |
87,7 |
41.735 |
_____3,4 |
|
Yes |
69.267 |
_____5,6 |
41.302 |
______3,3 | |
Source: LMEEM(2000)
The analysis of mobility by gender (Table 2) reveals that men are more likely to move.
Among those that change the location of the workplace, male workers are about 70%.
Table 2
Mobility and gender
|
Job mobility | |||||||||
|
____________No____________ |
Yes | ||||||||
|
Spatial mobility |
Spatial mobility | ||||||||
|
No |
% |
Yes |
% |
No |
% |
Yes |
% | ||
|
Gende |
Male |
652.239 |
60,1 |
28.730 |
68,8 |
41.959 |
60,6 |
28.752 |
69,6 |
|
Female |
432.260 |
39,9 |
13.005 |
31,2 |
27.308 |
39,4 |
12.550 |
30,4 | |
|
Total |
1.084.499 |
100,0 |
41.735 |
100,0 |
69.267 |
100,0 |
41.302 |
100,0 | |
Source: LMEEM(2000)
Table 3
Mobility and age in 1997
|
Job mobility | ||||
|
________No________ |
Yes | |||
|
Spatial mobility |
Spatial mobility | |||
|
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes | |
|
Average age |
37,0 |
36,4 |
34,1 |
31,8 |
Source: LMEEM(2000)
Workers that move are on average younger (see table 3) with lower tenure (see table 4)
and workers with higher levels of schooling are more likely to experience mobility
(table 5).
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Examining Variations of Prominent Features in Genre Classification
3. An alternative way to model merit good arguments
4. The name is absent
5. THE ECONOMICS OF COMPETITION IN HEALTH INSURANCE- THE IRISH CASE STUDY.
6. WP 48 - Population ageing in the Netherlands: Demographic and financial arguments for a balanced approach
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. The Impact of Cognitive versus Affective Aspects on Consumer Usage of Financial Service Delivery Channels
10. Towards Teaching a Robot to Count Objects