Table 4c
Consequences for demand, production and income with road pricing urban agglomeration (technological externalities)
(1) |
(2) (RH) |
(3) |
(4) |
(5) (SI) |
(6) (SI) |
(7) (SI) |
(8) (PI) |
(9) (PJ) |
(10) (PJ) | |
Copenhagen & Frederiksberg M |
-0.06 |
-0.01 |
-0.01 |
-0.01 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
Copenhagen C |
-0.05 |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
0.02 |
0.04 |
0.01 |
-0.01 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
Frederiksborg C |
-0.02 |
-0.04 |
-0.04 |
-0.03 |
-0.04 |
-0.02 |
-0.04 |
-0.12 |
-0.07 |
-0.06 |
Roskilde C |
-0.02 |
-0.04 |
-0.04 |
-0.03 |
-0.03 |
-0.02 |
-0.04 |
-0.12 |
-0.06 |
-0.04 |
Vestsjællands C |
0.03 |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
-0.08 |
-0.07 |
-0.08 |
-0.19 |
-0.16 |
-0.10 |
Storstr0ms C |
0.05 |
-0.01 |
-0.01 |
-0.01 |
-0.05 |
-0.03 |
-0.05 |
-0.20 |
-0.10 |
-0.06 |
Bornholms C |
0.00 |
-0.01 |
-0.01 |
-0.01 |
-0.01 |
0.01 |
-0.01 |
-0.04 |
-0.02 |
-0.01 |
Fyns C |
0.04 |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
-0.06 |
-0.03 |
-0.06 |
-0.18 |
-0.11 |
-0.07 |
Senderjyllands C |
0.05 |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
-0.03 |
-0.09 |
-0.06 |
-0.10 |
-0.19 |
-0.16 |
-0.11 |
Ribe C |
0.05 |
-0.04 |
-0.04 |
-0.04 |
-0.13 |
-0.10 |
-0.13 |
-0.26 |
-0.23 |
-0.15 |
Vejle C |
0.05 |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
-0.10 |
-0.08 |
-0.11 |
-0.24 |
-0.19 |
-0.11 |
Ringk0bing C |
0.04 |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
-0.11 |
-0.08 |
-0.12 |
-0.20 |
-0.20 |
-0.12 |
Ârhus C |
0.01 |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
-0.03 |
0.00 |
-0.03 |
-0.11 |
-0.05 |
-0.03 |
Viborg C |
0.03 |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
-0.07 |
-0.04 |
-0.07 |
-0.16 |
-0.12 |
-0.07 |
Nordjyllands C |
0.03 |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
-0.06 |
-0.03 |
-0.06 |
-0.15 |
-0.11 |
-0.06 |
Outside regions |
- |
- |
- |
- |
-0.01 |
0.01 |
-0.02 |
0.00 |
-0.05 |
-0.06 |
Total |
0.01 |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
-0.02 |
-0.04 |
-0.02 |
-0.05 |
-0.12 |
-0.08 |
-0.05 |
28