Sectoral Energy- and Labour-Productivity Convergence



benefit from the experience and technologies developed by the countries operating at the
forefront.

However, in spite of the evidence of convergence, cross-country differences in
energy- and labour-productivity performance seem to be persistent. Our
β-convergence
analysis has shown convergence to be conditional on cross-country differences in steady-state
characteristics, rather than to be unconditional with productivity levels converging to a
uniform steady state for all countries. This is in line with the results of our σ-convergence,
which indicated that cross-country differences in productivity levels remain to exist, even in
those sectors that display a convergence pattern. Moreover, we found that the speed of
energy-productivity convergence is in general higher than the speed of labour-productivity
convergence, in particular if we account for (unspecified) country-specific characteristics.
Nevertheless, at the same time cross-country differences in energy-productivity levels were
found to be still substantially larger than cross-country differences in labour-productivity
levels at all levels of sectoral aggregation.

In our search for the country- and sector-specific fundamentals determining these
(differences in) energy- and labour productivity developments, we found energy prices to
stimulate energy-productivity growth in the energy-intensive sectors while we did not find
much evidence of a positive relationship between wages and labour-productivity growth.
Moreover, our data show the cross-country differences in wages to be considerably larger
than cross-country differences in final energy prices (measured by the standard deviation of
the log of each variable). Hence, they are not likely to explain the persistent relatively high
cross-country differences in energy-productivity levels as compared to labour-productivity
levels. In addition, we found economies of scale to contribute to energy- and labour-
productivity growth in several sectors, while investment share, openness and specialization
play only a very limited role in explaining (cross-country) differences in energy- and labour-
productivity growth. Hence, there is a need for additional research to further explain sectoral
trends in energy- and labour-productivity growth across countries.

A possible explanation for the relatively high variation in energy-productivity levels
across countries might be that cross-country differences in environmental awareness
(influenced by social pressure) or stringency of environmental policies cause energy-
efficiency improvements to be a matter of urgency at different degrees in different countries.
Another reason might be a lack of international diffusion of energy-saving technologies as
compared to technologies enhancing labour productivity. This can be caused by the fact that,

19



More intriguing information

1. ESTIMATION OF EFFICIENT REGRESSION MODELS FOR APPLIED AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS RESEARCH
2. Testing Panel Data Regression Models with Spatial Error Correlation
3. Structural Conservation Practices in U.S. Corn Production: Evidence on Environmental Stewardship by Program Participants and Non-Participants
4. Can we design a market for competitive health insurance? CHERE Discussion Paper No 53
5. Qualifying Recital: Lisa Carol Hardaway, flute
6. Foreign Direct Investment and Unequal Regional Economic Growth in China
7. FUTURE TRADE RESEARCH AREAS THAT MATTER TO DEVELOPING COUNTRY POLICYMAKERS
8. Program Semantics and Classical Logic
9. Strategic Policy Options to Improve Irrigation Water Allocation Efficiency: Analysis on Egypt and Morocco
10. The Variable-Rate Decision for Multiple Inputs with Multiple Management Zones
11. Crime as a Social Cost of Poverty and Inequality: A Review Focusing on Developing Countries
12. Education and Development: The Issues and the Evidence
13. Restricted Export Flexibility and Risk Management with Options and Futures
14. The name is absent
15. Sectoral Energy- and Labour-Productivity Convergence
16. AGRICULTURAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION UNDER NAFTA: REPORTING ON THE REPORT CARD
17. A Dynamic Model of Conflict and Cooperation
18. The name is absent
19. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers
20. Beyond Networks? A brief response to ‘Which networks matter in education governance?’