Sectoral Energy- and Labour-Productivity Convergence



benefit from the experience and technologies developed by the countries operating at the
forefront.

However, in spite of the evidence of convergence, cross-country differences in
energy- and labour-productivity performance seem to be persistent. Our
β-convergence
analysis has shown convergence to be conditional on cross-country differences in steady-state
characteristics, rather than to be unconditional with productivity levels converging to a
uniform steady state for all countries. This is in line with the results of our σ-convergence,
which indicated that cross-country differences in productivity levels remain to exist, even in
those sectors that display a convergence pattern. Moreover, we found that the speed of
energy-productivity convergence is in general higher than the speed of labour-productivity
convergence, in particular if we account for (unspecified) country-specific characteristics.
Nevertheless, at the same time cross-country differences in energy-productivity levels were
found to be still substantially larger than cross-country differences in labour-productivity
levels at all levels of sectoral aggregation.

In our search for the country- and sector-specific fundamentals determining these
(differences in) energy- and labour productivity developments, we found energy prices to
stimulate energy-productivity growth in the energy-intensive sectors while we did not find
much evidence of a positive relationship between wages and labour-productivity growth.
Moreover, our data show the cross-country differences in wages to be considerably larger
than cross-country differences in final energy prices (measured by the standard deviation of
the log of each variable). Hence, they are not likely to explain the persistent relatively high
cross-country differences in energy-productivity levels as compared to labour-productivity
levels. In addition, we found economies of scale to contribute to energy- and labour-
productivity growth in several sectors, while investment share, openness and specialization
play only a very limited role in explaining (cross-country) differences in energy- and labour-
productivity growth. Hence, there is a need for additional research to further explain sectoral
trends in energy- and labour-productivity growth across countries.

A possible explanation for the relatively high variation in energy-productivity levels
across countries might be that cross-country differences in environmental awareness
(influenced by social pressure) or stringency of environmental policies cause energy-
efficiency improvements to be a matter of urgency at different degrees in different countries.
Another reason might be a lack of international diffusion of energy-saving technologies as
compared to technologies enhancing labour productivity. This can be caused by the fact that,

19



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The Impact of EU Accession in Romania: An Analysis of Regional Development Policy Effects by a Multiregional I-O Model
3. Evolution of cognitive function via redeployment of brain areas
4. Recognizability of Individual Creative Style Within and Across Domains: Preliminary Studies
5. Exchange Rate Uncertainty and Trade Growth - A Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear (Forecasting) Models
6. Pursuit of Competitive Advantages for Entrepreneurship: Development of Enterprise as a Learning Organization. International and Russian Experience
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Towards a framework for critical citizenship education
10. Sectoral specialisation in the EU a macroeconomic perspective