5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



176

which let them concentrate on tasks or activities improved their motivation. Many
students thought that they were motivated to learn mathematics individually because
they could concentrate better on the tasks in an individual session rather than a whole-
class (ap.5.2.37.8th P) or group session (ap.5.2.38.8th P). Sixteen 8th graders (3%)
suggested other factors as promoting their motivation. Of these, 13 mentioned
competition in whole-class discussion (ap.5.2.39.8th P) or group learning (ap.5.2.40.8th
P). One student said that teaching methods which set out the goals of learning clearly,
promoted his motivation. Two students indicated that they tried harder to learn
mathematics with methods that they were familiar with. Six 5th grade teachers (19%)
indicated that multiple factors contributed to promoting pupils’ motivation to learn
mathematics. Some teachers thought that a particular teaching method could include
these multiple factors. One 5th grade teacher wrote that practical work promoted pupils’
interest and their understanding of the curriculum, and in turn, enhanced pupils’
motivation to learn mathematics (ap.5.2.41.5th T). Otherteachers thought that adopting
several teaching methods, such as combining practical work to inspire pupils’ interest
and individual help to promote pupils’ understanding of the curriculum (ap.5.2.42.5th T)
would be beneficial in promoting pupils’ motivation. Few 8th graders (N=8, 2%) and their
teachers (N=2, 6%) proposed multiple factors.

Table 5.2: Percentages of teachers of both age groups and 8th graders who referred to

different aspects of promoting pupi

s’ motivation to learn mathematics             ______

5th        grade

teachers________

8th        grade

teachers_______

8th graders

Encouraging pupils’ involvement
in mathematics learning__________

N=8

(25%)_________

N=7
(23%)_________

N=30 (7%)

Promoting pupils’ interest in
mathematics learning____________

N=7
(22%)_________

N=7

(23%)_________

N=116(27%)

Meeting pupils’ individual needs
in mathematics learning__________

N=6
(19%)_________

N=6

(20%)_________

N=17(4%)

Promoting pupils’ understanding
of the curriculum__________________

N=3

(9%)__________

N=5
(18%)_________

N=108 (25%)

Developing pupils’ mathematical
thinking abilities____________________

N=2

(6%)__________

N=3
(10%)_________

N=13(3%)

Interaction with peers______________

N=26(6%)

Interaction with the teacher_______

N=56(13%)

Concentration ______________

N=44(10%)

Other reasons__________________

N=16 (3%)

Multiple reasons

N=6
(19%)_________

N=2

(6%)__________

N=8 (2%)

Total

N=32
(100%)________

N=30
(100%)________

N=434       '

(100%)_______

176



More intriguing information

1. 03-01 "Read My Lips: More New Tax Cuts - The Distributional Impacts of Repealing Dividend Taxation"
2. THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF AGRICULTURE
3. The name is absent
4. Publication of Foreign Exchange Statistics by the Central Bank of Chile
5. The name is absent
6. POWER LAW SIGNATURE IN INDONESIAN LEGISLATIVE ELECTION 1999-2004
7. Demand Potential for Goat Meat in Southern States: Empirical Evidence from a Multi-State Goat Meat Consumer Survey
8. Beyond Networks? A brief response to ‘Which networks matter in education governance?’
9. Smith and Rawls Share a Room
10. Heavy Hero or Digital Dummy: multimodal player-avatar relations in FINAL FANTASY 7