5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



217

achievement or teachers’ assessment. Pupils’ general self-concept was correlated with
their mathematics self-concept and the extent to which they perceived themselves good
or poor at mathematics respectively at both grades, although the correlation was not
high (see Table 7.1.1). In the literature, global self-esteem and self-perceptions of
competence are usually correlated positively. For instance, Marsh (1990) reported a
correlation between mathematics self-concept and general self-concept of .19 for SDQ-I
and .14 for SDQ-II. Compared with these results, much higher correlations were found
among the Japanese students (see Table 7.1.1).

Table 7.1.1: Correlations between pupils’ self-concept, mathematics self-concept and
pupils’ perceptions of being good or poor at mathematics

5trι graders    ~~~~

8tfl graders

N____

r_________

_P______

N____

r_________

_P______

Mathematics self-concept x Good at Maths

1437

.713

.000

2094

.675

.000

General self-concept x

Mathematics self-concept_________________

1410

.421

.000

2012

.324

.000

General self-concept x

Good at Maths_________________________

1450

.397

.000

2074

.345

.000

Pupils’ general self-concept, mathematics self-concept, perceived mathematics
performance and perceptions Ofteaching methods

This section examines the assumption that pupils’ general self-concept, mathematics
self-concept and perceived mathematics performance affect their perceptions of
teaching methods. 5th and 8th graders were divided into two groups using their scores on
general self-concept, and mathematics self-concept. The difference in perceptions of
teaching methods of the two groups was compared using Independent t-tests. 5th
graders and 8th graders were divided into three groups on the basis of their perceived
mathematics performance. The difference in the perceptions of teaching methods in the
three groups was compared, using analysis of variance. The details of how the groups
were formed are outlined below.

General self-concept - The total mean score for general self-concept at 5th grade was
24.76 (SD=5.57, median=25). The total mean score for general self-concept at 8th grade
was 32.09 (SD=6.20, median=32). The relatively large difference between the two
groups was due to the different possible total scores; 40 for 5th graders and 50 for 8th
graders. 5th graders were divided into those who scored at least 26 (44.7%) or below 25

217



More intriguing information

1. Input-Output Analysis, Linear Programming and Modified Multipliers
2. Personal Experience: A Most Vicious and Limited Circle!? On the Role of Entrepreneurial Experience for Firm Survival
3. The name is absent
4. The mental map of Dutch entrepreneurs. Changes in the subjective rating of locations in the Netherlands, 1983-1993-2003
5. Moi individuel et moi cosmique Dans la pensee de Romain Rolland
6. Does Presenting Patients’ BMI Increase Documentation of Obesity?
7. Regional specialisation in a transition country - Hungary
8. Tax Increment Financing for Optimal Open Space Preservation: an Economic Inquiry
9. Knowledge, Innovation and Agglomeration - regionalized multiple indicators and evidence from Brazil
10. Wirkung einer Feiertagsbereinigung des Länderfinanzausgleichs: eine empirische Analyse des deutschen Finanzausgleichs
11. Ongoing Emergence: A Core Concept in Epigenetic Robotics
12. Banking Supervision in Integrated Financial Markets: Implications for the EU
13. How Low Business Tax Rates Attract Multinational Headquarters: Municipality-Level Evidence from Germany
14. WP 92 - An overview of women's work and employment in Azerbaijan
15. Commuting in multinodal urban systems: An empirical comparison of three alternative models
16. The name is absent
17. Examining the Regional Aspect of Foreign Direct Investment to Developing Countries
18. THE ANDEAN PRICE BAND SYSTEM: EFFECTS ON PRICES, PROTECTION AND PRODUCER WELFARE
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent