5th and 8th grade pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of the relationships between teaching methods, classroom ethos, and positive affective attitudes towards learning mathematics in Japan



306

Johnson, R.T. et al. 1983. Effects of Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic
Learning Experiences on Social Development.
Exceptional Children, v49 n4 p323-29
Jan 1983.

Jones, E.E. et al. 1972. The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes
of behaviour. In (Eds.) Jones, E.E.
Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behaviour,
Morristown1NJ: General Learning Press: 79-94.

Joshi, M.S.et al. 1997. Maternal expectations of child development in India, Japan and
England.
Journal of cross-cultural psychology. Vol.28. No.2, March. 219-234.

Kage, M. et al. 1990. Jidouno naihatsuteki doukiduke to gakushuuni oyobasu
hyoukakouzouno kouka [The effects of evaluation structure on children’s intrinsic
motivation and learning] Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology [Kyouiku
Shinrigaku kenkyuu]. 38. 36-45.

Kage, M. 1991. The effects of evaluation on intrinsic motivation. Paper read at Paper
presented at the Meetings of the Japan Association of Educational Psychology, at
Joetsu, Japan.

Kajita, M. et al. 1985. Kojin level no Shidouron (Personal teaching theory) Sansuu-
suugaku ni okeru kyoushino Shidoukoudouno kaiseki. [Personal teaching theory:
Analysis of teachers’ teaching methods of arthmetic and mathematics]
Bulletin of the
Faculty of Education, Nagoya University
(Educational Psychology). Vol.32,121-172.

Kashiwagi, K. 1986. Personality development of adolescents. In Stevenson, et al. Child
development and education in Japan.
New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

Katz,L. 1997 SheJi HouDong JiaoFa (The Project Approch). ERIC Clearing house on
Elementary and Elementary Childhood Education.

Kelly, G.A. 1970. A belief introduction to personal construct theory. In DBannister (Ed.),
Perspectives in personal construct theory. New York: Academic Press, pp.1-29.

Kelly, W.P. et al. 1985. A study of math anxiety∕math avoidance in preservice
elementary teachers.
Arithemetic Teacher 32 (5): 51-53.

Kenneth1J. 1989. Introduction to the study. In the IEA Study of Mathematics II: Contexts
and outcomes of school mathematics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

Kerlinger, F. 1964. Foundations of Behavioural Research. Edited by edition, 3rd. Vol.
124. NewYork: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Kifer, E.et al. 1989. Chapter 9 Attitudes, Preferences and Opinions. In The IEA Study of
Mathematics II: Contexts and Outcomes of School Mathematics,
edited by Rogitaille, et
al. Oxford: Pergamon press: 178-208.

Kiefer, C.W. 1970. The psychological interdependence of family, school, and
bureaucracy in Japan.
American Anthropologist 72: 66-75.

306



More intriguing information

1. Poverty transition through targeted programme: the case of Bangladesh Poultry Model
2. The Shepherd Sinfonia
3. The mental map of Dutch entrepreneurs. Changes in the subjective rating of locations in the Netherlands, 1983-1993-2003
4. The Employment Impact of Differences in Dmand and Production
5. A production model and maintenance planning model for the process industry
6. PROJECTED COSTS FOR SELECTED LOUISIANA VEGETABLE CROPS - 1997 SEASON
7. A Duality Approach to Testing the Economic Behaviour of Dairy-Marketing Co-operatives: The Case of Ireland
8. A Principal Components Approach to Cross-Section Dependence in Panels
9. Evidence of coevolution in multi-objective evolutionary algorithms
10. Better policy analysis with better data. Constructing a Social Accounting Matrix from the European System of National Accounts.
11. Migrating Football Players, Transfer Fees and Migration Controls
12. The name is absent
13. Forecasting Financial Crises and Contagion in Asia using Dynamic Factor Analysis
14. BUSINESS SUCCESS: WHAT FACTORS REALLY MATTER?
15. For Whom is MAI? A theoretical Perspective on Multilateral Agreements on Investments
16. The name is absent
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. The quick and the dead: when reaction beats intention
20. Business Cycle Dynamics of a New Keynesian Overlapping Generations Model with Progressive Income Taxation