20 Anna Iara / Iulia Traistaru
Appendix
A1. Summary statistics
Tab. A1.1: The share of exports in regional industrial output, Hungary, 1994-2000
|
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 | |
|
Mean_________ |
0.28 |
0.33 |
0.36 |
0.41 |
0.44 |
0.46 |
0.49 |
|
Std. Deviation |
0.09 |
0.12 |
0.13 |
0.15 |
0.17 |
0.2 |
0.18 |
|
Minimum______ |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.17 |
0.18 |
0.23 |
0.23 |
0.26 |
|
Maximum_____ |
0.53 |
0.72 |
0.74 |
0.75 |
0.79 |
0.83 |
0.83 |
|
Max/min_______ |
3.98 |
5.39 |
4.23 |
4.11 |
3.36 |
3.54 |
3.18 |
|
Coeff. of var. |
0.34 |
0.37 |
0.38 |
0.37 |
0.38 |
0.42 |
0.36 |
Source: Own calculations based on the REGSTAT data set
Tab. A1.2: Average share of exports in regional industrial output, for border
and non-border regions Hungary 1994-2000
|
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 | |
|
BEU_______ |
0.44 |
0.59 |
0.63 |
0.70 |
0.78 |
0.83 |
0.83 |
|
BAC_______ |
0.27 |
0.31 |
0.32 |
0.35 |
0.37 |
0.37 |
0.44 |
|
BEX_______ |
0.24 |
0.31 |
0.35 |
0.42 |
0.49 |
0.54 |
0.45 |
|
INT_________ |
0.25 |
0.29 |
0.33 |
0.39 |
0.41 |
0.43 |
0.46 |
Source: Own calculations based on the REGSTAT data set
Tab. A1.3: FDI intensity at regional level, Hungary, 1994-2000
|
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 | |
|
Mean__________ |
1.18 |
1.28 |
1.35 |
1.41 |
1.43 |
1.75 |
1.83 |
|
Std. Deviation |
0.99 |
1.12 |
1.20 |
1.26 |
1.31 |
1.50 |
1.65 |
|
Minimum_______ |
0.36 |
0.37 |
0.38 |
0.44 |
0.46 |
0.49 |
0.51 |
|
Maximum______ |
4.81 |
5.42 |
5.82 |
6.10 |
6.33 |
7.10 |
8.00 |
|
Max/min________ |
13.26 |
14.46 |
15.17 |
13.93 |
13.89 |
14.55 |
15.68 |
|
Coeff. of var._______ |
0.84 |
0.88 |
0.89 |
0.89 |
0.91 |
0.86 |
0.90 |
Source: Own calculations based on the REGSTAT data set
Tab. A1.4: Average FDI intensity at regional level for border and non-border
regions, Hungary 1994-2000
|
Region type |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
BEU________ |
1.94 |
2.15 |
2.29 |
2.39 |
2.41 |
2.73 |
2.75 |
|
BAC_______ |
0.77 |
0.81 |
0.85 |
0.89 |
0.91 |
1.24 |
1.30 |
|
BEX_______ |
1.16 |
1.23 |
1.33 |
1.32 |
1.30 |
1.73 |
1.67 |
|
INT_________ |
1.43 |
1.59 |
1.68 |
1.77 |
1.80 |
2.06 |
2.24 |
Source: Own calculations based on the REGSTAT data set
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. On the Desirability of Taxing Charitable Contributions
5. The name is absent
6. Dual Inflation Under the Currency Board: The Challenges of Bulgarian EU Accession
7. Parallel and overlapping Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis B and C virus Infections among pregnant women in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria
8. Tissue Tracking Imaging for Identifying the Origin of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias: A New Role of Cardiac Ultrasound in Electrophysiology
9. The name is absent
10. DISCRIMINATORY APPROACH TO AUDITORY STIMULI IN GUINEA FOWL (NUMIDA MELEAGRIS) AFTER HYPERSTRIATAL∕HIPPOCAMP- AL BRAIN DAMAGE