20 Anna Iara / Iulia Traistaru
Appendix
A1. Summary statistics
Tab. A1.1: The share of exports in regional industrial output, Hungary, 1994-2000
|
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 | |
|
Mean_________ |
0.28 |
0.33 |
0.36 |
0.41 |
0.44 |
0.46 |
0.49 |
|
Std. Deviation |
0.09 |
0.12 |
0.13 |
0.15 |
0.17 |
0.2 |
0.18 |
|
Minimum______ |
0.13 |
0.13 |
0.17 |
0.18 |
0.23 |
0.23 |
0.26 |
|
Maximum_____ |
0.53 |
0.72 |
0.74 |
0.75 |
0.79 |
0.83 |
0.83 |
|
Max/min_______ |
3.98 |
5.39 |
4.23 |
4.11 |
3.36 |
3.54 |
3.18 |
|
Coeff. of var. |
0.34 |
0.37 |
0.38 |
0.37 |
0.38 |
0.42 |
0.36 |
Source: Own calculations based on the REGSTAT data set
Tab. A1.2: Average share of exports in regional industrial output, for border
and non-border regions Hungary 1994-2000
|
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 | |
|
BEU_______ |
0.44 |
0.59 |
0.63 |
0.70 |
0.78 |
0.83 |
0.83 |
|
BAC_______ |
0.27 |
0.31 |
0.32 |
0.35 |
0.37 |
0.37 |
0.44 |
|
BEX_______ |
0.24 |
0.31 |
0.35 |
0.42 |
0.49 |
0.54 |
0.45 |
|
INT_________ |
0.25 |
0.29 |
0.33 |
0.39 |
0.41 |
0.43 |
0.46 |
Source: Own calculations based on the REGSTAT data set
Tab. A1.3: FDI intensity at regional level, Hungary, 1994-2000
|
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 | |
|
Mean__________ |
1.18 |
1.28 |
1.35 |
1.41 |
1.43 |
1.75 |
1.83 |
|
Std. Deviation |
0.99 |
1.12 |
1.20 |
1.26 |
1.31 |
1.50 |
1.65 |
|
Minimum_______ |
0.36 |
0.37 |
0.38 |
0.44 |
0.46 |
0.49 |
0.51 |
|
Maximum______ |
4.81 |
5.42 |
5.82 |
6.10 |
6.33 |
7.10 |
8.00 |
|
Max/min________ |
13.26 |
14.46 |
15.17 |
13.93 |
13.89 |
14.55 |
15.68 |
|
Coeff. of var._______ |
0.84 |
0.88 |
0.89 |
0.89 |
0.91 |
0.86 |
0.90 |
Source: Own calculations based on the REGSTAT data set
Tab. A1.4: Average FDI intensity at regional level for border and non-border
regions, Hungary 1994-2000
|
Region type |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
|
BEU________ |
1.94 |
2.15 |
2.29 |
2.39 |
2.41 |
2.73 |
2.75 |
|
BAC_______ |
0.77 |
0.81 |
0.85 |
0.89 |
0.91 |
1.24 |
1.30 |
|
BEX_______ |
1.16 |
1.23 |
1.33 |
1.32 |
1.30 |
1.73 |
1.67 |
|
INT_________ |
1.43 |
1.59 |
1.68 |
1.77 |
1.80 |
2.06 |
2.24 |
Source: Own calculations based on the REGSTAT data set
More intriguing information
1. The Folklore of Sorting Algorithms2. Workforce or Workfare?
3. Palkkaneuvottelut ja työmarkkinat Pohjoismaissa ja Euroopassa
4. Problems of operationalizing the concept of a cost-of-living index
5. Non Linear Contracting and Endogenous Buyer Power between Manufacturers and Retailers: Empirical Evidence on Food Retailing in France
6. Regionale Wachstumseffekte der GRW-Förderung? Eine räumlich-ökonometrische Analyse auf Basis deutscher Arbeitsmarktregionen
7. The name is absent
8. Distortions in a multi-level co-financing system: the case of the agri-environmental programme of Saxony-Anhalt
9. Pursuit of Competitive Advantages for Entrepreneurship: Development of Enterprise as a Learning Organization. International and Russian Experience
10. The name is absent