Integration, Regional Specialization and Growth Differentials in EU Acceding Countries
21
Tab. A1.5: Structural changes in regional manufacturing employment in
different types of regions, 1994-2000, Hungary
Region type__________________________________ |
BEU |
BAC |
BEX |
INT |
Food, beverages, tobacco__________________________ |
0.28 |
2.84 |
2.58 |
-5.70 |
Textiles, clothing and leather_______________________ |
2.38 |
-3.50 |
0.58 |
0.54 |
Wood and paper products_______________________ |
3.31 |
4.01 |
2.66 |
-9.98 |
Fuel, chemicals, rubber, plastics_____________________ |
5.55 |
2.39 |
-1.83 |
-6.11 |
Non-metallic mineral products_____________________ |
0.16 |
-4.63 |
4.00 |
0.47 |
Metallurgy, machinery, equipment, motor vehicles |
2.58 |
-3.07 |
5.99 |
-5.50 |
Furniture and other manufacturing_________________ |
4.27 |
-6.37 |
-2.50 |
4.60 |
Source: Own calculations based on the REGSTAT data set
Tab. A1.6: Average manufacturing specialization of regions (Herfindahl index),
for border and non-border regions, Hungary, 1994-2000
Region type |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
Change (%) |
BEU |
0.2414 |
0.2358 |
0.2393 |
0.2386 |
0.2466 |
0.2372 |
0.2418 |
0.17 |
BAC |
0.1944 |
0.1894 |
0.1879 |
0.1912 |
0.2001 |
0.1890 |
0.1874 |
-3.60 |
BEX |
0.2133 |
0.2170 |
0.2167 |
0.2207 |
0.2180 |
0.2094 |
0.2456 |
15.14 |
INT______ |
0.2066 |
0.2080 |
0.2176 |
0.2321 |
0.2374 |
0.2305 |
0.2387 |
15.54 |
Average |
0.2062 |
0.2047 |
0.2078 |
0.2147 |
0.2205 |
0.2114 |
0.2195 |
6.45 |
Source: Own calculations based on the REGSTAT data set
Tab. A1.7: Manufacturing specialization of regions (Herfindahl index),
Hungary,1994-2000
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 | |
Mean__________ |
0.2062 |
0.2047 |
0.2078 |
0.2147 |
0.2205 |
0.2114 |
0.2195 |
Std. Deviation |
0.0299 |
0.0284 |
0.0352 |
0.0435 |
0.0398 |
0.0437 |
0.0614 |
Minimum_______ |
0.1502 |
0.1509 |
0.1534 |
0.1541 |
0.15 |
0.1464 |
0.1463 |
Maximum______ |
0.2781 |
0.2714 |
0.2928 |
0.3342 |
0.3029 |
0.3271 |
0.3768 |
Max/min________ |
1.85 |
1.8 |
1.91 |
2.17 |
2.02 |
2.23 |
2.57 |
Coeff. of var._______ |
0.15 |
0.14 |
0.17 |
0.2 |
0.18 |
0.21 |
0.28 |
Source: Own calculations based on the REGSTAT data set
More intriguing information
1. Macroeconomic Interdependence in a Two-Country DSGE Model under Diverging Interest-Rate Rules2. The name is absent
3. The Impact of Hosting a Major Sport Event on the South African Economy
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?
8. Meat Slaughter and Processing Plants’ Traceability Levels Evidence From Iowa
9. Willingness-to-Pay for Energy Conservation and Free-Ridership on Subsidization – Evidence from Germany
10. What Drives the Productive Efficiency of a Firm?: The Importance of Industry, Location, R&D, and Size