Integration, Regional Specialization and Growth Differentials in EU Acceding Countries: Evidence from Hungary



Integration, Regional Specialization and Growth Differentials in EU Acceding Countries

21


Tab. A1.5: Structural changes in regional manufacturing employment in
different types of regions, 1994-2000, Hungary

Region type__________________________________

BEU

BAC

BEX

INT

Food, beverages, tobacco__________________________

0.28

2.84

2.58

-5.70

Textiles, clothing and leather_______________________

2.38

-3.50

0.58

0.54

Wood and paper products_______________________

3.31

4.01

2.66

-9.98

Fuel, chemicals, rubber, plastics_____________________

5.55

2.39

-1.83

-6.11

Non-metallic mineral products_____________________

0.16

-4.63

4.00

0.47

Metallurgy, machinery, equipment, motor vehicles

2.58

-3.07

5.99

-5.50

Furniture and other manufacturing_________________

4.27

-6.37

-2.50

4.60

Source: Own calculations based on the REGSTAT data set

Tab. A1.6: Average manufacturing specialization of regions (Herfindahl index),
for border and non-border regions, Hungary, 1994-2000

Region type

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

Change (%)
1994-2000

BEU

0.2414

0.2358

0.2393

0.2386

0.2466

0.2372

0.2418

0.17

BAC

0.1944

0.1894

0.1879

0.1912

0.2001

0.1890

0.1874

-3.60

BEX

0.2133

0.2170

0.2167

0.2207

0.2180

0.2094

0.2456

15.14

INT______

0.2066

0.2080

0.2176

0.2321

0.2374

0.2305

0.2387

15.54

Average

0.2062

0.2047

0.2078

0.2147

0.2205

0.2114

0.2195

6.45

Source: Own calculations based on the REGSTAT data set

Tab. A1.7: Manufacturing specialization of regions (Herfindahl index),
Hungary,1994-2000

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

Mean__________

0.2062

0.2047

0.2078

0.2147

0.2205

0.2114

0.2195

Std. Deviation

0.0299

0.0284

0.0352

0.0435

0.0398

0.0437

0.0614

Minimum_______

0.1502

0.1509

0.1534

0.1541

0.15

0.1464

0.1463

Maximum______

0.2781

0.2714

0.2928

0.3342

0.3029

0.3271

0.3768

Max/min________

1.85

1.8

1.91

2.17

2.02

2.23

2.57

Coeff. of var._______

0.15

0.14

0.17

0.2

0.18

0.21

0.28

Source: Own calculations based on the REGSTAT data set



More intriguing information

1. Changing spatial planning systems and the role of the regional government level; Comparing the Netherlands, Flanders and England
2. Fortschritte bei der Exportorientierung von Dienstleistungsunternehmen
3. The name is absent
4. Program Semantics and Classical Logic
5. THE WAEA -- WHICH NICHE IN THE PROFESSION?
6. The Folklore of Sorting Algorithms
7. The name is absent
8. Luce Irigaray and divine matter
9. Smith and Rawls Share a Room
10. Developmental changes in the theta response system: a single sweep analysis
11. Psychological Aspects of Market Crashes
12. Human Rights Violations by the Executive: Complicity of the Judiciary in Cameroon?
13. Regional dynamics in mountain areas and the need for integrated policies
14. Estimating the Impact of Medication on Diabetics' Diet and Lifestyle Choices
15. The Evolution
16. The name is absent
17. Who runs the IFIs?
18. Placenta ingestion by rats enhances y- and n-opioid antinociception, but suppresses A-opioid antinociception
19. A Consistent Nonparametric Test for Causality in Quantile
20. The Macroeconomic Determinants of Volatility in Precious Metals Markets