Integration, Regional Specialization and Growth Differentials in EU Acceding Countries
21
Tab. A1.5: Structural changes in regional manufacturing employment in
different types of regions, 1994-2000, Hungary
Region type__________________________________ |
BEU |
BAC |
BEX |
INT |
Food, beverages, tobacco__________________________ |
0.28 |
2.84 |
2.58 |
-5.70 |
Textiles, clothing and leather_______________________ |
2.38 |
-3.50 |
0.58 |
0.54 |
Wood and paper products_______________________ |
3.31 |
4.01 |
2.66 |
-9.98 |
Fuel, chemicals, rubber, plastics_____________________ |
5.55 |
2.39 |
-1.83 |
-6.11 |
Non-metallic mineral products_____________________ |
0.16 |
-4.63 |
4.00 |
0.47 |
Metallurgy, machinery, equipment, motor vehicles |
2.58 |
-3.07 |
5.99 |
-5.50 |
Furniture and other manufacturing_________________ |
4.27 |
-6.37 |
-2.50 |
4.60 |
Source: Own calculations based on the REGSTAT data set
Tab. A1.6: Average manufacturing specialization of regions (Herfindahl index),
for border and non-border regions, Hungary, 1994-2000
Region type |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
Change (%) |
BEU |
0.2414 |
0.2358 |
0.2393 |
0.2386 |
0.2466 |
0.2372 |
0.2418 |
0.17 |
BAC |
0.1944 |
0.1894 |
0.1879 |
0.1912 |
0.2001 |
0.1890 |
0.1874 |
-3.60 |
BEX |
0.2133 |
0.2170 |
0.2167 |
0.2207 |
0.2180 |
0.2094 |
0.2456 |
15.14 |
INT______ |
0.2066 |
0.2080 |
0.2176 |
0.2321 |
0.2374 |
0.2305 |
0.2387 |
15.54 |
Average |
0.2062 |
0.2047 |
0.2078 |
0.2147 |
0.2205 |
0.2114 |
0.2195 |
6.45 |
Source: Own calculations based on the REGSTAT data set
Tab. A1.7: Manufacturing specialization of regions (Herfindahl index),
Hungary,1994-2000
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 | |
Mean__________ |
0.2062 |
0.2047 |
0.2078 |
0.2147 |
0.2205 |
0.2114 |
0.2195 |
Std. Deviation |
0.0299 |
0.0284 |
0.0352 |
0.0435 |
0.0398 |
0.0437 |
0.0614 |
Minimum_______ |
0.1502 |
0.1509 |
0.1534 |
0.1541 |
0.15 |
0.1464 |
0.1463 |
Maximum______ |
0.2781 |
0.2714 |
0.2928 |
0.3342 |
0.3029 |
0.3271 |
0.3768 |
Max/min________ |
1.85 |
1.8 |
1.91 |
2.17 |
2.02 |
2.23 |
2.57 |
Coeff. of var._______ |
0.15 |
0.14 |
0.17 |
0.2 |
0.18 |
0.21 |
0.28 |
Source: Own calculations based on the REGSTAT data set
More intriguing information
1. A Classical Probabilistic Computer Model of Consciousness2. Improving the Impact of Market Reform on Agricultural Productivity in Africa: How Institutional Design Makes a Difference
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Insurance within the firm
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Studies on association of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and its effect on improvement of sorghum bicolor (L.)
9. THE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LABORATORY
10. From Aurora Borealis to Carpathians. Searching the Road to Regional and Rural Development