Table A2.- Distribution of the sample depending on Province's classification.
All firms N° % PROVINCE 1 |
Survived |
Disappeared | |||
N° |
% |
N° |
% | ||
Liability Limited |
281 76.2 |
164 |
81.2 |
117 70.1 | |
Not limited |
88 23.8 |
38 |
18.8 |
50 29.9 | |
Sector’s Technical High |
92 24.9 |
62 |
30.6 |
30 18.0 | |
Development Medium |
118 32.0 |
70 |
34.7 |
48 28.7 | |
Low |
159 43.1 |
70 |
34.7 |
89 53.3 | |
Innovation of Innovative |
213 57.7 |
151 |
74.8 |
62 37.1 | |
Product Non Innovative |
156 42.3 |
51 |
25.2 |
105 62.9 | |
Innovation of Innovative |
249 67.5 |
186 |
92.1 |
63 37.7 | |
Process Non innovative |
120 32.5 |
16 |
7.9 |
104 62.3 | |
PROVINCE 2 | |||||
Liability Limited |
204 75.3 |
181 |
77.4 |
23 62.2 | |
Not limited |
67 24.7 |
53 |
22.6 |
14 37.8 | |
Sector’s Technical High |
64 23.6 |
59 |
25.2 |
5 13.5 | |
Development Medium |
102 37.6 |
91 |
38.9 |
11 29.7 | |
Low |
105 38.7 |
84 |
35.9 |
21 56.8 | |
Innovation of Innovative |
172 63.5 |
162 |
69.2 |
10 27.0 | |
Product Non Innovative |
99 36.5 |
72 |
30.8 |
27 73.0 | |
Innovation of Innovative |
219 80.8 |
202 |
86.3 |
17 45.9 | |
Process Non innovative |
52 19.2 |
32 |
13.7 |
20 54.1 | |
PROVINCE 3 | |||||
Liability Limited |
206 74.6 |
137 |
72.9 |
69 78.4 | |
Not limited |
70 25.4 |
51 |
27.1 |
19 21.6 | |
Sector’s Technical High |
43 15.6 |
27 |
14.4 |
16 18.2 | |
Development Medium |
82 29.7 |
56 |
29.8 |
26 29.5 | |
Low |
151 54.7 |
105 |
55.8 |
46 52.3 | |
Innovation of Innovative |
153 55.4 |
128 |
68.1 |
25 28.4 | |
Product Non Innovative |
123 44.6 |
60 |
31.9 |
63 71.6 | |
Innovation of Innovative |
179 64.9 |
150 |
79.8 |
29 33.0 | |
Process Non innovative |
97 35.1 |
38 |
20.0 |
59 67.0 | |
PROVINCE 4 | |||||
Liability Limited |
118 75.2 |
97 |
76.4 |
21 70.0 | |
Not limited |
39 24.8 |
30 |
23.6 |
9 30.0 | |
Sector’s Technical High |
35 22.3 |
29 |
22.8 |
6 20.0 | |
Development Medium |
45 28.7 |
41 |
32.3 |
4 13.3 | |
Low |
77 49.0 |
57 |
44.9 |
20 66.7 | |
Innovative |
93 59.2 |
83 |
65.4 |
10 33.3 |
19