Table A1.- Principal values of the sample depending on Province s classification.
Employment and age offirms in 1990.
|
Employment |
Age | |||||
|
All firms |
Survived |
Disappeared |
All firms |
Survived |
Disappeared | |
|
PROVINCE 1 | ||||||
|
Mean |
275.8 |
405.8 |
118.5 |
23.6 |
25.9 |
20.8 |
|
Median |
36.0 |
100.5 |
24.0 |
16.0 |
19.0 |
11.0 |
|
Mode |
11.0 |
11.0 |
12.0 |
5.0 |
4.0 |
5.0 |
|
Percentile 25 |
18.0 |
21.0 |
15.0 |
6.0 |
9.0 |
5.0 |
|
Percentile 50 |
36.0 |
100.5 |
24.0 |
16.0 |
19.0 |
11.0 |
|
Percentile 75 |
279.5 |
362.25 |
117.0 |
30.5 |
36.0 |
27.0 |
|
Skewness |
15.4 |
11.7 |
3.2 |
1.7 |
1.4 |
2.1 |
|
N° observations |
369 |
202 |
167 |
369 |
202 |
167 |
|
PROVINCE 2 | ||||||
|
Mean |
278.0 |
307.2 |
93.7 |
21.2 |
22.6 |
12.08 |
|
Median |
42.0 |
46.0 |
26.0 |
16.0 |
17.5 |
8.0 |
|
Mode |
11.0 |
11.0 |
16.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
8.0 |
|
Percentile 25 |
18.0 |
18.75 |
17.0 |
6.0 |
6.0 |
5.0 |
|
Percentile 50 |
42.0 |
46.0 |
26.0 |
16.0 |
17.5 |
8.0 |
|
Percentile 75 |
267.0 |
300.25 |
90.0 |
31.0 |
32.25 |
16.5 |
|
5.1 |
4.8 |
3.5 |
1.7 |
1.6 |
1.4 | |
|
N° observations |
271 |
234 |
37 |
271 |
234 |
37 |
|
PROVINCE 3 | ||||||
|
Mean |
285.2 |
365.8 |
113.1 |
19.6 |
20.6 |
17.6 |
|
Median |
35.0 |
38.5 |
29.5 |
14.5 |
17.0 |
11.0 |
|
Mode |
13.0 |
13.0 |
12.0 |
3.0 |
4.0 |
3.0 |
|
Percentile 25 |
18.0 |
19.0 |
17.0 |
6.25 |
8.0 |
5.0 |
|
Percentile 50 |
35.0 |
38.5 |
29.5 |
14.5 |
17.0 |
11.0 |
|
Percentile 75 |
171.75 |
201.0 |
135.75 |
25.75 |
27.0 |
20.5 |
|
9.9 |
8.2 |
3.7 |
2.3 |
2.0 |
2.8 | |
|
N° observations |
276 |
188 |
88 |
276 |
188 |
88 |
|
PROVINCE 4 | ||||||
|
Mean |
186.4 |
209.8 |
87.1 |
21.6 |
20.9 |
24.4 |
|
Median |
33.0 |
35.0 |
29.5 |
14.0 |
15.0 |
13.0 |
|
Mode |
10.0 |
13.0 |
10.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
9.0 |
|
Percentile 25 |
19.0 |
20.0 |
12.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
6.8 |
|
Percentile 50 |
33.0 |
35.0 |
29.5 |
14.0 |
15.0 |
13.0 |
|
Percentile 75 |
256.0 |
284.0 |
78.3 |
27.0 |
27.0 |
32.5 |
17
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING SOCIAL WELFARE EFFECTS OF NEW AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY
6. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
7. WP 48 - Population ageing in the Netherlands: Demographic and financial arguments for a balanced approach
8. Firm Closure, Financial Losses and the Consequences for an Entrepreneurial Restart
9. Who runs the IFIs?
10. The name is absent