|
1996 (1.01.) |
148,0 |
108,1 |
39,9 |
73,0 |
|
1997 (1.01.)___________ |
147,5 |
_________107,8________ |
________39,7 |
73,1 |
|
1998 (1.01.)___________ |
147,1 |
_________107,5_________ |
________39,6 |
73,1 |
|
1999 (1.01.)___________ |
146,7 |
_________107,3_________ |
________39,4 |
73,1 |
|
2000 (1.01.)___________ |
145,9 |
_________106,5_________ |
________39,4 |
73,0 |
* Present Territory of Russia
Russian Statistical Year-Book 2000. Moscow, 2000
The drastic changes in the demographic situation, the increasing depopulation of a series of
regions as well as the real drop in the population growth in cities, which during the course of
many decades show a tendency of uninterrupted growth, influenced the developmental
perspectives of the Russian cities to a likewise considerable extent. The large cities and even
the "million-cities" with a continuing increase in the number of inhabitants show in recent
years a tendency of stabilising or even a retrogressive development in the number of
inhabitants. Table 2 shows the decline in the population numbers of million-population cities
(Table 2).
Table 2. Cities of Russia of more than 1,000,000 Population
|
Rank |
City |
Economic |
Population (1,000 Residents) |
Population Trends | |||||
|
1970 |
1979 |
1989 |
1991 |
2000 |
1991: 1970 |
2000: 1991 | |||
|
T(1) |
Moscow |
Central Region______ |
7,194* 7,063 |
8,142* 7,970 |
8,972* 8,782 |
9,003* 8,809 |
8,630* 8,389 |
125,1% 124,7% |
95,8% 95,2% |
|
7(2) |
St.Petersburg |
Northwest Region______ |
4,033 |
4,588 |
5,024 |
5,035 |
4,694 |
124,8% |
93,2% |
|
173) |
Nizhny |
Volga-Vyatka |
1,170 |
1,344 |
1,403 |
1,409 |
1,357 |
120,4% |
96,3% |
|
7(4) |
Novosibirsk |
West Siberian |
1,179 |
1,334 |
1,420 |
1,431 |
1,399 |
121,4% |
97,8% |
|
7(6) |
Yekaterinburg |
Ural Region |
1,025 |
1,211 |
1,298 |
1,309 |
1,266 |
127,8% |
96,7% |
|
7(5) |
Samara |
Volga Region |
1,027 |
1,198 |
1,220 |
1,222 |
1,156 |
119,0% |
94,6% |
|
7 (10) |
Omsk |
West Siberian |
"821 |
1,014 |
1,148 |
1,167 |
1,149 |
142,1% |
98,5% |
|
8 (8) |
Kazan________ |
Volga Region |
869 |
993 |
1,094 |
1,105 |
1,101 |
127,2% |
99,6% |
|
9 (13) |
Ufa___________ |
Volga Region |
780 |
978 |
1,078 |
1,097 |
1091 |
140,6% |
99,5% |
|
10 (7) |
Cheliabinsk |
Ural Region |
875 |
1,030 |
1,107 |
1,114 |
1,083 |
127,3% |
97,2% |
|
11 (9) |
Perm_________ |
Ural Region |
850 |
999 |
1,040 |
1,049 |
1,010 |
123,4% |
96,3% |
|
12 (12) |
Rostov-on-Don |
North |
789 |
934 |
1,019 |
1,028 |
1,013 |
130,3% |
98,5% |
|
13 (11) |
Volgograd_____ |
Volga Region |
815 |
928 |
997 |
1,005 |
993 |
123,3% |
98,8 |
* Subordinated to the City Administration
Russian Statistical Year-Book 2000. Moscow, 2000.
In addition to these factors, one should also take into account the consequences of the
migration process, which in the last few years has become a serious problem: the resettlement
More intriguing information
1. Short Term Memory May Be the Depletion of the Readily Releasable Pool of Presynaptic Neurotransmitter Vesicles2. Job quality and labour market performance
3. Locke's theory of perception
4. Popular Conceptions of Nationhood in Old and New European
5. BEN CHOI & YANBING CHEN
6. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?
7. DURABLE CONSUMPTION AS A STATUS GOOD: A STUDY OF NEOCLASSICAL CASES
8. The name is absent
9. The Tangible Contribution of R&D Spending Foreign-Owned Plants to a Host Region: a Plant Level Study of the Irish Manufacturing Sector (1980-1996)
10. Towards Learning Affective Body Gesture