|
1996 (1.01.) |
148,0 |
108,1 |
39,9 |
73,0 |
|
1997 (1.01.)___________ |
147,5 |
_________107,8________ |
________39,7 |
73,1 |
|
1998 (1.01.)___________ |
147,1 |
_________107,5_________ |
________39,6 |
73,1 |
|
1999 (1.01.)___________ |
146,7 |
_________107,3_________ |
________39,4 |
73,1 |
|
2000 (1.01.)___________ |
145,9 |
_________106,5_________ |
________39,4 |
73,0 |
* Present Territory of Russia
Russian Statistical Year-Book 2000. Moscow, 2000
The drastic changes in the demographic situation, the increasing depopulation of a series of
regions as well as the real drop in the population growth in cities, which during the course of
many decades show a tendency of uninterrupted growth, influenced the developmental
perspectives of the Russian cities to a likewise considerable extent. The large cities and even
the "million-cities" with a continuing increase in the number of inhabitants show in recent
years a tendency of stabilising or even a retrogressive development in the number of
inhabitants. Table 2 shows the decline in the population numbers of million-population cities
(Table 2).
Table 2. Cities of Russia of more than 1,000,000 Population
|
Rank |
City |
Economic |
Population (1,000 Residents) |
Population Trends | |||||
|
1970 |
1979 |
1989 |
1991 |
2000 |
1991: 1970 |
2000: 1991 | |||
|
T(1) |
Moscow |
Central Region______ |
7,194* 7,063 |
8,142* 7,970 |
8,972* 8,782 |
9,003* 8,809 |
8,630* 8,389 |
125,1% 124,7% |
95,8% 95,2% |
|
7(2) |
St.Petersburg |
Northwest Region______ |
4,033 |
4,588 |
5,024 |
5,035 |
4,694 |
124,8% |
93,2% |
|
173) |
Nizhny |
Volga-Vyatka |
1,170 |
1,344 |
1,403 |
1,409 |
1,357 |
120,4% |
96,3% |
|
7(4) |
Novosibirsk |
West Siberian |
1,179 |
1,334 |
1,420 |
1,431 |
1,399 |
121,4% |
97,8% |
|
7(6) |
Yekaterinburg |
Ural Region |
1,025 |
1,211 |
1,298 |
1,309 |
1,266 |
127,8% |
96,7% |
|
7(5) |
Samara |
Volga Region |
1,027 |
1,198 |
1,220 |
1,222 |
1,156 |
119,0% |
94,6% |
|
7 (10) |
Omsk |
West Siberian |
"821 |
1,014 |
1,148 |
1,167 |
1,149 |
142,1% |
98,5% |
|
8 (8) |
Kazan________ |
Volga Region |
869 |
993 |
1,094 |
1,105 |
1,101 |
127,2% |
99,6% |
|
9 (13) |
Ufa___________ |
Volga Region |
780 |
978 |
1,078 |
1,097 |
1091 |
140,6% |
99,5% |
|
10 (7) |
Cheliabinsk |
Ural Region |
875 |
1,030 |
1,107 |
1,114 |
1,083 |
127,3% |
97,2% |
|
11 (9) |
Perm_________ |
Ural Region |
850 |
999 |
1,040 |
1,049 |
1,010 |
123,4% |
96,3% |
|
12 (12) |
Rostov-on-Don |
North |
789 |
934 |
1,019 |
1,028 |
1,013 |
130,3% |
98,5% |
|
13 (11) |
Volgograd_____ |
Volga Region |
815 |
928 |
997 |
1,005 |
993 |
123,3% |
98,8 |
* Subordinated to the City Administration
Russian Statistical Year-Book 2000. Moscow, 2000.
In addition to these factors, one should also take into account the consequences of the
migration process, which in the last few years has become a serious problem: the resettlement
More intriguing information
1. On the Existence of the Moments of the Asymptotic Trace Statistic2. Long-Term Capital Movements
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Evidence of coevolution in multi-objective evolutionary algorithms
6. Graphical Data Representation in Bankruptcy Analysis
7. Crime as a Social Cost of Poverty and Inequality: A Review Focusing on Developing Countries
8. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?
9. Foreign Direct Investment and the Single Market
10. Are Public Investment Efficient in Creating Capital Stocks in Developing Countries?