Table 4. Correlation matrix between dependent and independent variables'
CHANTOT |
CHANMIC |
CHANSM_____ | |
Demand | |||
POPGR |
0.4226* |
0.4273* | |
GDPCAPGR | |||
DEMAND |
-0.3127* |
-0.3280* | |
LGPOPUL |
0.3810* |
0.3999* | |
Urbanisation/ agglomeration | |||
YOUNGPOP |
0.2216** |
0.2121** | |
MIGR | |||
HOUSEH |
-0.2130** | ||
SQDENS |
0.2818* |
0.2909* | |
Unemployment | |||
UNEMPLOY |
0.2129** | ||
Employment structure | |||
NONQUAL |
0.2413** | ||
GRAD | |||
Social structure | |||
WORKERS | |||
EMPLOYER |
0.2677* |
0.2821* | |
MANUF |
0.3032* |
0.3027* | |
AGRIC |
-0.2991* |
-0.3056* | |
Household wealth | |||
DEPCAP | |||
Size structure | |||
MEANSIZE |
0.3651* |
0.4272* | |
SMFIRMS |
0.3233* |
n.a. |
0.2834* |
SMPEREN |
n.a. |
0.4600* | |
LMFIRMS |
0.2515* |
n.a. | |
LMPEREN |
0.3247* |
n.a. | |
Production structure | |||
SPEC |
0.3883* | ||
SPECFIR |
0.3444* | ||
Government investments | |||
GOVERN |
0.2965* |
0.3161* | |
INCENTIVE |
0.3466* |
0.3589* | |
SIESHOP |
0.3145* |
0.3188* | |
PARCEL___________ |
0.3058*_______ |
0.3089*_______ |
* Coefficients significant at 0.05 level. ** Coefficients significant at 0.10 level.
'The correlation coefficients exceeding 0.10 significance level are excluded.
Those mentioned independent variables are incorporated in the regression analysis of each
dependent variable to explain change in firm population in those three groups. After some
efforts, the best equation fitted to explain CHANTOT is given below. The F test suggests
13
More intriguing information
1. Cancer-related electronic support groups as navigation-aids: Overcoming geographic barriers2. Financial Markets and International Risk Sharing
3. The name is absent
4. Dual Inflation Under the Currency Board: The Challenges of Bulgarian EU Accession
5. The name is absent
6. Une Classe de Concepts
7. The name is absent
8. Constrained School Choice
9. Evidence on the Determinants of Foreign Direct Investment: The Case of Three European Regions
10. The name is absent