Change in firm population and spatial variations: The case of Turkey



In this paper, change in firm population in the manufacturing industry within Turkey has
been viewed between 1985 and 1992. An explanatory model has been developed to
determine the major causal factors affecting these changes. Although the data that is
supplied by State Institute of Statistics is based on the establishment level, they are referred
as "firms" or "enterprises" since the emphasis is on the performance of industrial production
in a single physical location rather than a legal entity (for enterprise/firm and establishment
definitions, see Ark and Monnikof 1996, Schreyer 1996). Another point is that, due to the
presence of many state owned enterprises in Turkey, the study covers the data for the private
sector.

The factors bringing regional differentiation in firm population are aimed to be determined
by regression and correlation analyses. Multiple least squares regression is applied in the
analyses of relationships. However, the models were developed through careful examination
of the separate and joint effects of various sets of explanatory variables rather than a
mechanical application of a stepwise, R2-maximizing procedure.

2. The Profile of Turkish Manufacturing Industry

Besides the presence of different SME-definition criteria, such as number of persons
engaged, fixed assets, turnover figures etc., in this study, firms engaging up to 9 persons are
considered as "micro", while those with 10 to 24 persons are classified as "small". Firms in
which 25 to 199 persons engaged are called as "medium" and the remaining group
employing more than 200 persons, constitutes "large" category. While the number of firms
and persons engaged from 1963 to 1992 are given in Table 1, figure 2 and 3 outlines their
shares by size classes.

Table 1. Number of firms and persons engaged by size classes, 1963-1992

1963

1970

1980

1985

1992

Firms

Per. Eng

Firms

Per. Eng

Firms

Per. Eng

Firms

Per. Eng

Firms

Per. Eng

Micro*

0

0

325

1928

n.a.

n.a.

183572

472081

186574

545809

Small**

1258

20346

1847

25415

3854

47531

5777

90566

5227

79198

Medium***

1370

81256

2398

127936

4010

202955

3877

233308

4817

296366

Large

146

83372

321

171663

438

249320

599

336711

723

381781

Total

2774

184974

4891

326942

185461

993472

193825

1132666

197341

1303154

*Shows the firms with power equipment of more than 50 HP in 1970

** Corresponds to the category of firms employing 10 to 19 persons in 1963, 1970 and 1980

*** Corresponds to the category of firms employing 20 to 199 persons in 1963, 1970 and 1980
Source: SIS, General Census of Industry and Establishments in various years



More intriguing information

1. Linking Indigenous Social Capital to a Global Economy
2. Getting the practical teaching element right: A guide for literacy, numeracy and ESOL teacher educators
3. The name is absent
4. El Mercosur y la integración económica global
5. Cardiac Arrhythmia and Geomagnetic Activity
6. PACKAGING: A KEY ELEMENT IN ADDED VALUE
7. The name is absent
8. Optimal Private and Public Harvesting under Spatial and Temporal Interdependence
9. The Cost of Food Safety Technologies in the Meat and Poultry Industries.
10. The name is absent
11. The name is absent
12. Implementation of Rule Based Algorithm for Sandhi-Vicheda Of Compound Hindi Words
13. The Formation of Wenzhou Footwear Clusters: How Were the Entry Barriers Overcome?
14. Knowledge, Innovation and Agglomeration - regionalized multiple indicators and evidence from Brazil
15. The name is absent
16. Equity Markets and Economic Development: What Do We Know
17. Experimental Evidence of Risk Aversion in Consumer Markets: The Case of Beef Tenderness
18. PROJECTED COSTS FOR SELECTED LOUISIANA VEGETABLE CROPS - 1997 SEASON
19. Consciousness, cognition, and the hierarchy of context: extending the global neuronal workspace model
20. The name is absent