Change in firm population and spatial variations: The case of Turkey



□ 1963         ∏1970         ∏1980         □ 1985         ∏1992

Figure 1. Share of firms by size classes, 1963-1992

Due to data constraints, when the figures for 1970 and 1980 are disregarded, it can be said
that as a result of a steady increase in the share of micro firms from 0% in 1963 to 95% in
1992, that of other size classes has decreased. When the number of persons engaged has
been viewed by size classes, the rates are much more fluctuated as shown in figure 3. The
most important result from these two figures is that, the share of firms and the share of
persons engaged are not relatively distributed across the size classes.

Figure 2. Share of persons engaged by size classes, 1963-1992



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The Role of Evidence in Establishing Trust in Repositories
3. Ventas callejeras y espacio público: efectos sobre el comercio de Bogotá
4. Housing Market in Malaga: An Application of the Hedonic Methodology
5. Reconsidering the value of pupil attitudes to studying post-16: a caution for Paul Croll
6. Naïve Bayes vs. Decision Trees vs. Neural Networks in the Classification of Training Web Pages
7. INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES
8. An Efficient Secure Multimodal Biometric Fusion Using Palmprint and Face Image
9. EMU: some unanswered questions
10. Evaluating the Success of the School Commodity Food Program