Regional dynamics in mountain areas and the need for integrated policies



12

area level). One core measure to enhance this ”bottom-up” approach was the provision of training of
regional consultants and of on ”area-wide” regional consultancy, especially in the beginning of the
initiatives. In the process, the emphasis was shifted further to regional innovation and know-how
transfer.

In the Austrian context it is very important that the provinces (Lander) also developed aid
programmes to support regional development initiatives for economic development in mountain
areas. These programmes complemented the federal development in some peripheral mountain
regions. Selected examples for programmes by the provinces are:

- ”Styrian aid initiative for independent regional initiatives” (STEFREI)

- ”Village and Regional Development” (ORE) province of Carinthia

- Village renewal guidelines, province of Lower Austria
- ”Spatial Planning Programme” (ROSP) province of Tyrol

But in many parts of the mountain area (especially in Western Austria) intensive house-building
activity, an almost exclusively demand-led granting of planning permission on the part of the local
authorities (autonomous as regards local spatial planning), and largely absent guidelines on the part of
regional planning (the provinces), have allowed settlement development to run out of control. The
results of unchecked settlement development (land-use, traffic growth, land speculation), in some
regions further driven by foreign demand for holiday homes, was already leading to reveal of the
discussion towards regulatory policy terms of reference in the alpine area in the early 90s. This new
assessment of guidance measures in spatial planning (complementing the financial incentives to boost
the economy) is clearly reflected in the 1991 Austrian regional planning policy.

An old problem appears in a new light: both land utilisation and regulation measures (spatial planning
in the narrow sense) and spatially effective publicly funded infrastructure and investment incentives
(traditionally the most important regional policy instruments), are spread over all levels of the
political-administrative system, largely without any clear rules of co-ordination. At the beginning of
the 90s, however, the recognition had dawned that the regional policy effects of the traditional
instruments in Austria (investment in infrastructure and investment incentives) had their limits. Put



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF RESEARCH ON WOMEN FARMERS IN AFRICA: LESSONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS; WITH AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
3. Fighting windmills? EU industrial interests and global climate negotiations
4. From music student to professional: the process of transition
5. Feature type effects in semantic memory: An event related potentials study
6. Agricultural Policy as a Social Engineering Tool
7. The name is absent
8. Opciones de política económica en el Perú 2011-2015
9. The Role of Trait Emotional Intelligence (El) in the Workplace.
10. NATIONAL PERSPECTIVE
11. The name is absent
12. The storage and use of newborn babies’ blood spot cards: a public consultation
13. Towards Teaching a Robot to Count Objects
14. Shifting Identities and Blurring Boundaries: The Emergence of Third Space Professionals in UK Higher Education
15. Dementia Care Mapping and Patient-Centred Care in Australian residential homes: An economic evaluation of the CARE Study, CHERE Working Paper 2008/4
16. Lumpy Investment, Sectoral Propagation, and Business Cycles
17. Internationalization of Universities as Internationalization of Bildung
18. Optimal Vehicle Size, Haulage Length, and the Structure of Transport Costs
19. Investment and Interest Rate Policy in the Open Economy
20. Review of “From Political Economy to Economics: Method, the Social and Historical Evolution of Economic Theory”