23
Table 5: Mountain farms according to categories of difficulty (1995)
|
Mountain Farms |
total |
non-moun- area |
Mountain area sum |
Austria | ||||
|
Group 1 |
Group 2 |
Group 3 |
Group 4 | |||||
|
in % of Austria |
11.4 |
9.9 |
12.1 |
_______2.6 |
36.0 |
_______166 |
48.6 (1) |
__________100 |
|
Share of UAA |
15.3 |
12.0 |
13.8 |
3.0 |
51.7 |
8.6 |
48.8 |
100 |
|
Share of LU (in %) |
19.3 |
14.3 |
15.1 |
_______2.5 |
51.2 |
___________7.3 |
__________52.3 |
__________100 |
|
SGM per ha farm |
94 |
73 |
59 |
48 |
73 |
60 |
67 |
100 |
|
Farm income level |
87 |
84 |
78 |
61 |
82 |
- |
85 |
100 |
|
Household income |
92 |
88 |
85 |
79 |
88 |
- |
90 |
100 |
1) 10.141 mountain farm units are not situated in the mountain area but in general in adjacent less-favoured areas.
2) Standard Gross Margin (SGM) in relation to sum of UAA and forest area
Source: OSTAT, Dax 1997
More intriguing information
1. Needing to be ‘in the know’: strategies of subordination used by 10-11 year old school boys2. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers
3. Modelling the health related benefits of environmental policies - a CGE analysis for the eu countries with gem-e3
4. Reconsidering the value of pupil attitudes to studying post-16: a caution for Paul Croll
5. Regional differentiation in the Russian federation: A cluster-based typification
6. The Trade Effects of MERCOSUR and The Andean Community on U.S. Cotton Exports to CBI countries
7. The name is absent
8. Une Gestion des ressources humaines à l'interface des organisations : vers une GRH territoriale ?
9. Distribution of aggregate income in Portugal from 1995 to 2000 within a SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) framework. Modeling the household sector
10. Popular Conceptions of Nationhood in Old and New European