Table 1: Population density in mountain areas of Austria
_______________________share of national tota |
j (in %)_____________________ | |||||
Mountain |
population |
population |
surface area |
UAA1) |
all farmers |
mountain |
central |
78.2 |
19.4 |
23.1 |
18.5 |
20.2 |
28.8 |
peripheral |
36.7 |
14.9 |
37.7 |
32.9 |
25.0 |
53.5 |
Extremely |
15.0 |
1.4 |
8.4 |
6.1 |
3.2 |
17.0 |
Austrian |
60.0 |
35.7 |
69.2 |
57.6 |
48.4 |
99.4 |
1) utilised agricultural area (UAA)
2) mountain farmers with most severe difficulties (category 4).
Source: OSTAT, OROK, own calculations
Table 2: Population density according to altitude levels (1991)
Population per km2 of settlement area |
Sum | |||||
< 700m |
700-799 |
800-899 |
900-999 |
> 1000 | ||
Alpine area - |
528 |
201 |
258 |
211 |
195 |
362 |
Alpine area - |
246 |
177 |
131 |
116 |
103 |
208 |
Non-Alpine area |
227 | |||||
Austria |
240 | |||||
Maximum of population density (per km2 of settlement area) | ||||||
Alpine area - |
583 |
274 |
381 |
355 |
452 |
468 |
Alpine area - |
271 |
203 |
155 |
167 |
148 |
236 |
Non-Alpine area |
232 | |||||
Austria |
263 |
Source: Schindegger et al. 1997, p. 39
More intriguing information
1. The use of formal education in Denmark 1980-19922. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. DURABLE CONSUMPTION AS A STATUS GOOD: A STUDY OF NEOCLASSICAL CASES
5. Eigentumsrechtliche Dezentralisierung und institutioneller Wettbewerb
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Second Order Filter Distribution Approximations for Financial Time Series with Extreme Outlier
9. A parametric approach to the estimation of cointegration vectors in panel data
10. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews