SME'S SUPPORT AND REGIONAL POLICY IN EU - THE NORTE-LITORAL PORTUGUESE EXPERIENCE



Table 1

CLUSTERS

IPROD2

INPUT2

GEST2

SATIS2

QUALI2

RD2

1

Mean

5,3190

,0000

19,2879

,0000

,3849

75,0081

(2)

Std. Deviation

7,5223

,0000

25,0297

,0000

,5444

32,0076

2

Mean

22,4722

1,0203

57,9756

9,4461

8,7413

,3444

(39)

Std. Deviation

19,4968

4,7546

29,7236

19,3984

13,2593

2,1508

3

Mean

76,2450

1,3275

10,6318

3,1458

7,9822

,6678

(60)

Std. Deviation

14,6678

6,3005

8,0364

5,6924

10,5086

3,4449

4

Mean

11,7043

,0000

6,3029

6,5700

75,4228

,0000

(5)

Std. Deviation

16,0550

,0000

5,3888

10,8515

17,5992

,0000

TOTAL

Mean

52,0780

1,1268

28,0099

5,5660

11,2993

1,9199

(106)

Std. Deviation

32,3633

5,5316

29,8845

12,9790

18,5545

11,0383

The clusters presented in Table 1 are relatively stable over method variations and reveal
some interesting relations. We can observe that two clusters concentrate 94% of the 106
firms studied, with two others of minor importance in terms of number of firms. The
results highlight the following aspects:

Cluster 3 shows an investment profile in which IPROD2 is very high and clearly
above the mean. It corresponds to
static modernisation of firms based on new
productive equipment (with effects also on INPUT2), which is in line with the
dominant SME entrepreneurial model. It seems that these firms are not changing
their understanding of the new rules of competition;

Cluster 2 exhibits a largely dominant role of variables GEST2 and SATIS2. Firms
of this cluster are investing in new technologies to modernise management activities
and are more client oriented. This corresponds to
dynamic modernisation, which
means that these firms have begun to change, but the dynamic factors that were
chosen are not strong enough to sustain competitive advantages;

Cluster 4 displays a great relevance of variable QUALI2 and a significative
importance of variable SATIS2. Firms of this group have chosen
offensive
investment in order to prepare themselves for the new competitive conditions;

Cluster 1 presents exceptional values in variable RD2. The two firms in this cluster
were able to apply for an investment project with a large R&D component outside
the specific SME-CI ‘measure for technological competence acquisition’. Just as in
Cluster 4, this corresponds to an
offensive investment policy.



More intriguing information

1. Distortions in a multi-level co-financing system: the case of the agri-environmental programme of Saxony-Anhalt
2. Synchronisation and Differentiation: Two Stages of Coordinative Structure
3. Comparison of Optimal Control Solutions in a Labor Market Model
4. The name is absent
5. Models of Cognition: Neurological possibility does not indicate neurological plausibility.
6. CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS
7. The name is absent
8. WP RR 17 - Industrial relations in the transport sector in the Netherlands
9. Input-Output Analysis, Linear Programming and Modified Multipliers
10. The name is absent