Taking Johnson and Scholes (1993) strategy directions, we classified them in three
types according to the attitude of the firm towards change in the environment: passive
(consolidation of the market position), active (growth in the present market,
diversification) and innovative (product development, market development).
The analysis of Table 2 shows two ‘composite groups’: 57% of the firms have invested
in their modernisation; 31% of the firms develop an innovative strategy and/or show an
offensive investment policy. The remaining firms (12%) are in the middle of these two
groups - they pursue an active strategy based on a dynamic modernisation.
Table 2
Strategy |
Clusters |
TOTAL | ||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 | |||
Consolidation |
Count % within Strategy Direction % within Clusters |
1 2,3% |
17 38,6% 43,6% |
24 54,5% 40,0% |
2 4,5% 40,0% |
44 |
Market growth |
Count % within Strategy Direction % within Clusters |
11 34,4% 28,2% |
18 56,3% 30,0% |
3 9,4% 60,0% |
32 | |
Product |
Count % within Strategy Direction % within Clusters |
1 5,9% |
3 17,6% 7,7% |
13 76,5% 21,7% |
17 100,0% 16,0% | |
Market |
Count % within Strategy Direction % within Clusters |
6 |
4 40,0% 6,7% |
10 100,0% 9,4% | ||
Diversification |
Count % within Strategy Direction % within Clusters |
2 66,7% 5,1% |
1 33,3% 1,7% |
3 | ||
TOTAL |
Count % within Strategy Direction % within Clusters |
2 1,9% |
39 36,8% 100,0% |
60 56,6% 100,0% |
5 4,7% |
106 100,0% 100,0% |
Figure 1 presents the percentage of firms in each cluster investing in four different types
of innovation. In general terms, a large majority of firms in each cluster invested in
modernisation of management and, by contrast, a few firms invested in new services to
clients, which is a more sophisticated factor of competitiveness. As expected, product
innovation dominate in Cluster 1 which is associated predominantly to R&D
investment, and greater incidence of process innovation in Cluster 3 is associated with
the preference of firms in that cluster for productive equipment.
More intriguing information
1. Notes on an Endogenous Growth Model with two Capital Stocks II: The Stochastic Case2. The name is absent
3. Government spending composition, technical change and wage inequality
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Centre for Longitudinal Studies
7. Are Japanese bureaucrats politically stronger than farmers?: The political economy of Japan's rice set-aside program
8. DIVERSITY OF RURAL PLACES - TEXAS
9. Optimal Rent Extraction in Pre-Industrial England and France – Default Risk and Monitoring Costs
10. THE INTERNATIONAL OUTLOOK FOR U.S. TOBACCO