SME'S SUPPORT AND REGIONAL POLICY IN EU - THE NORTE-LITORAL PORTUGUESE EXPERIENCE



Taking Johnson and Scholes (1993) strategy directions, we classified them in three
types according to the attitude of the firm towards change in the environment:
passive
(consolidation of the market position), active (growth in the present market,
diversification) and
innovative (product development, market development).

The analysis of Table 2 shows two ‘composite groups’: 57% of the firms have invested
in their
modernisation; 31% of the firms develop an innovative strategy and/or show an
offensive investment policy. The remaining firms (12%) are in the middle of these two
groups - they pursue an
active strategy based on a dynamic modernisation.

Table 2

Strategy
Direction

Clusters

TOTAL

1

2

3

4

Consolidation

Count

% within Strategy Direction

% within Clusters

1

2,3%
50,0%

17

38,6%

43,6%

24

54,5%

40,0%

2

4,5%

40,0%

44
100,0%
41,5%

Market growth

Count

% within Strategy Direction

% within Clusters

11

34,4%

28,2%

18

56,3%

30,0%

3

9,4%

60,0%

32
100,0%
30,2%

Product
development

Count

% within Strategy Direction

% within Clusters

1

5,9%
50,0%

3

17,6%

7,7%

13

76,5%

21,7%

17

100,0%

16,0%

Market
development

Count

% within Strategy Direction

% within Clusters

6
60,0%
15,4%

4

40,0%

6,7%

10

100,0%

9,4%

Diversification

Count

% within Strategy Direction

% within Clusters

2

66,7%

5,1%

1

33,3%

1,7%

3
100,0%
2,8%

TOTAL

Count

% within Strategy Direction

% within Clusters

2

1,9%
100,0%

39

36,8%

100,0%

60

56,6%

100,0%

5

4,7%
100,0%

106

100,0%

100,0%

Figure 1 presents the percentage of firms in each cluster investing in four different types
of innovation. In general terms, a large majority of firms in each cluster invested in
modernisation of management and, by contrast, a few firms invested in new services to
clients,
which is a more sophisticated factor of competitiveness. As expected, product
innovation
dominate in Cluster 1 which is associated predominantly to R&D
investment, and greater incidence of
process innovation in Cluster 3 is associated with
the preference of firms in that cluster for productive equipment.



More intriguing information

1. Financial Markets and International Risk Sharing
2. Regional science policy and the growth of knowledge megacentres in bioscience clusters
3. MULTIPLE COMPARISONS WITH THE BEST: BAYESIAN PRECISION MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY RANKINGS
4. Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys
5. What should educational research do, and how should it do it? A response to “Will a clinical approach make educational research more relevant to practice” by Jacquelien Bulterman-Bos
6. The problem of anglophone squint
7. Lending to Agribusinesses in Zambia
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent