153
of a multi-cultural society, that possibilities of self-direction
for Aborigines rest on a fragile power base, that if the uniqueness
of Aborigines is accepted and the current framework of a multi-
cultural society is also accepted, then Aborigines must exercise their
« -Ч-
autonomy outside this framework, knowing they will be rejected
for doing this by the same society that brought it about.
11.33 Summary
The conceptualisation of a multi-cultural Australia excludes
Aborigines. The official reasoning behind this exclusion may
be formulated in the following way:
-r>"
AU ethnic groups are equal. The Aboriginal people are
unique, different. Their position in society cannot be
included in any conceptualisation of a multicultural
society. Their uniqueness excludes them from multi-
cultural society.
This, in fact, is the situation to be found in a study of the
documentation. Aborigines are excluded from a multi-cultural
Australia.
The Aboriginal people are put into a situation without the
possibility of resolution. They are told that any initiative
taken in Aboriginal matters should be taken by Aborigines themselves.
No-one disagrees with this - least of all Aboriginal people.
Interviews carried out for this study provided evidence that
Aboriginal people have interacted with theorizing about self-
determination and themselves theorize that Aborigines have to
help themselves. The question is whether a group oppressed,
rejected, powerless for hundreds of years can, at a point of
time, be given (by committees) the right to self-determination/
self-management that is real.
Furthermore, while Aborigines are physically located within
the multi-cultural society, structurally they must determine
their future outside this society, and this not by their own
choice.
More intriguing information
1. Co-ordinating European sectoral policies against the background of European Spatial Development2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. QUEST II. A Multi-Country Business Cycle and Growth Model
5. Pursuit of Competitive Advantages for Entrepreneurship: Development of Enterprise as a Learning Organization. International and Russian Experience
6. THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF AGRICULTURE
7. Neighborhood Effects, Public Housing and Unemployment in France
8. The name is absent
9. Strategic Effects and Incentives in Multi-issue Bargaining Games
10. The name is absent