|
Location |
Unit Weight t/m3 |
Uniaxial Strength kg/cm2 |
Slake Durability |
Point Load kg/cm2_________ |
|
SK-6 ~ |
__________2,42 |
_________37,10 |
98,6^0^ |
_________14,32 |
|
SK-9________ |
__________2,62 |
_______278,60 |
________99,20 | |
|
SK-17_______ |
__________2,65 |
_______390,00 |
________99,00 |
17,3^2^ |
Table 4 Akveren Formation
|
Location |
Unit Weight t/m3 |
Uniaxial Strength kg/cm2 |
Slake Durability |
Point Load kg/cm2________ |
|
SK-5 ~ |
__________2,51 |
________74,30 |
_________4,00 |
Table 5 Atba∙ • Formation
According to Deere and Miller (1966) the core samples taken from boreholes only SK-8 and
SK-31 specimens represents medium strength. Others represent very low strength. When
swelling, disintegrating and weakening strength taken into consideration due to soaking and
drying only SK-2 represents high strength. The others yield very high strength. Taking all
these data mentioned above risk evaluation was carried out by means of GIS.
Figure 4. GIS R∙ sk Analas^ s