Im, S.I., M.H. Pesaran, and Y. Shin, “Testing for unit roots in hetero-
geneous panels,” Journal of Econometrics, 2002, 115, 53-74.
Klenow, P.J. and A. Rodrigues-Clare, “The neoclassical revival in
growth economics: has it gone too far?,” in NBER Macroeconomics An-
nual, Bernanke B. e Rotemberg J. eds., MIT Press, Cambridge, Mas-
sachusetts, 1997, pp. 73-103.
Levin, A., C.F. Lin, and C-S.J. Chu, “Unit root tests in panel data:
Asymptotic and finite sample properties,” Journal of Econometrics, 2002,
108, 1-24.
Maddala, G.S. and S. Wu, “Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with
Panel Data and a New Simple Test,” Oxford Bulletin of Economics and
Statistics, 1999, 61, 631-52.
Margani, P. and R. Ricciuti, “Further evidence on convergence across
Italian regions,” 41st Congress of the European Regional Science Associa-
tion, 2001.
Mauro, L. and E. Podrecca, “The case of Italian regions: convergence or
dualism?,” Economic Notes, 1994, 24 (2), 447-72.
Parente, S. and E. Prescott, “Barriers to riches,” Walras-Pareto Lectures,
Universit de Lausanne, 2000.
Pesaran, M.H. and R.P. Smith, “Estimating long-run relationships from
dynamic heterogeneous panels,” Journal of Econometrics, 1995, 68, 79-
113.
_ , , and K.S. Im, “Dynamic linear models for heterogeneous panels,”
in Matyas L. and P. Sevestre (eds.) The Econometrics of Panel Data, 2nd
Edition, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing, 1996.
19
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
4. Foreign direct investment in the Indian telecommunications sector
5. THE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LABORATORY
6. Herman Melville and the Problem of Evil
7. Konjunkturprognostiker unter Panik: Kommentar
8. Death as a Fateful Moment? The Reflexive Individual and Scottish Funeral Practices
9. Regionale Wachstumseffekte der GRW-Förderung? Eine räumlich-ökonometrische Analyse auf Basis deutscher Arbeitsmarktregionen
10. The name is absent