Convergence in TFP among Italian Regions - Panel Unit Roots with Heterogeneity and Cross Sectional Dependence



Table 2: Panel Unit Root Tests of TFP - ln(yit)

All Regions (N=19)

Test Statistic P-value           Conclusion

LLC

-5.69

0.0804

No Convergence

IPS

-1.62

0.3140

No Convergence

MADF

258.98

26.38

Convergence

South (N=7)

Basilicata, Calabria, Campania, Molise, Puglia, Sardegna, Sicilia

Test Statistic P-value           Conclusion

LLC

-4.56

0.0888

No Convergence

IPS

-1.88

0.1430

No Convergence

MADF

29.26

26.38

Convergence

Centre-North (N=12)

Emilia Romagna, Friuli V.G., Liguria, Lombardia, Piemonte
Trentino A.A., Veneto, Lazio, Marche, Toscana, Umbria, Abruzzo

Test Statistic P-value           Conclusion

LLC

-4.38

0.0264

Convergence

IPS

-1.56

0.4430

No Convergence

MADF

89.36

26.38

Convergence

Centre (N=5)

Lazio, Marche, Umbria, Toscana, Abruzzo

Test

Statistic

P-value____

Conclusion

LLC

-2.78

0.0627

No Convergence

IPS

-1.63

0.3940

No Convergence

MADF

28.63

26.38

Convergence

North (N=7)

Friuli V.G., Liguria, Lombardia, Piemonte, Trentino A.A.
Veneto, Emilia Romagna

Test

Statistic P-value           Conclusion

LLC
IPS
MADF

-3.88     0.0204              Convergence

-1.69     0.3130           No Convergence

24.79_____26.38____________No Convergence_________

For MADF, the critical value is reported instead of the p-value

22



More intriguing information

1. Olive Tree Farming in Jaen: Situation With the New Cap and Comparison With the Province Income Per Capita.
2. Correlates of Alcoholic Blackout Experience
3. The name is absent
4. PERFORMANCE PREMISES FOR HUMAN RESOURCES FROM PUBLIC HEALTH ORGANIZATIONS IN ROMANIA
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. The Formation of Wenzhou Footwear Clusters: How Were the Entry Barriers Overcome?
8. EMU: some unanswered questions
9. The name is absent
10. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?