power.
As it cannot exist in right on any rational and solid principles of government, so neither
does it exist in the constitution of Oriental governments,—and I do insist upon it, that
Oriental governments know nothing of arbitrary power. I have taken as much pains as I
could to examine into the constitutions of them. I have been endeavoring to inform myself
at all times on this subject; of late my duty has led me to a more minute inspection of them;
and I do challenge the whole race of man to show me any of the Oriental governors
claiming to themselves a right to act by arbitrary will.
The greatest part of Asia is under Mahomedan governments. To name a Mahomedan
government is to name a government by law. It is a law enforced by stronger sanctions than
any law that can bind a Christian sovereign. Their law is believed to be given by God; and
it has the double sanction of law and of religion, with which the prince is no more
authorized to dispense than any one else. And if any man will produce the Koran to me, and
will but show me one text in it that authorizes in any degree an arbitrary power in the
government, I will confess that I have read that book, and been conversant in the affairs of
Asia, in vain. There is not such a syllable in it; but, on the contrary, against oppressors by
name every letter of that law is fulminated. There are interpreters established throughout all
Asia to explain that law, an order of priesthood, whom they call men of the law. These men
are conservators of the law; and to enable them to preserve it in its perfection, they are
secured from the resentment of the sovereign: for he cannot touch them. Even their kings
are not always vested with a real supreme power, but the government is in some degree
republican.
To bring this point a little nearer home,—since we are challenged thus, since we are led into