where,
= a vector of parameters.
The system in (15) implies that the cooperative firm is a “virtual” profit maximiser. In other words
the price of milk paid to suppliers is restricted in the estimation to be equivalent to the “virtual”
price implied by Hotelling’s Lemma.
To statistically test the validity of the system in (15) we can compare the log-likelihood value
obtained from estimation of this system with that yielded by estimation of a modified system which
involves replacing (15)(d) by (16):
Pm =Pm( -,Py,w-m,k) (16)
where,
≠ is a vector of parameters.
The modified system does not impose the condition that the actual milk price is got by applying
Hotelling’s Lemma. The Conrad and Unger (1987) test ascertains whether pm systematically
differs frompvm over the entire sample10.
4. Data and empirical estimation
Our empirical model is tested by estimating the systems (15)(a), (b), (c), (d) and (15)(a), (b), (c),
(16) using time-series data on the dairy-processing sector. Short-run profits were defined to be
functions of the price of processed output (py), the wage rate (wɪ), the price of non-milk materials
13
More intriguing information
1. Spatial patterns in intermunicipal Danish commuting2. An Attempt to 2
3. Cross border cooperation –promoter of tourism development
4. Delivering job search services in rural labour markets: the role of ICT
5. Determinants of Household Health Expenditure: Case of Urban Orissa
6. A simple enquiry on heterogeneous lending rates and lending behaviour
7. The name is absent
8. Feature type effects in semantic memory: An event related potentials study
9. Enterpreneurship and problems of specialists training in Ukraine
10. DEVELOPING COLLABORATION IN RURAL POLICY: LESSONS FROM A STATE RURAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL