last point implies that the crash occurs independently of the true probability
of a drop next period, showing that the anticipation (together with the drop
of course) has driven the crash.
The next figure gives us a way to visualize the effect of drop anticipations
on the magnitude of a crash, given a particular drop of endowment next
period. We fix a 20% drop in the following simulation.

Figure 2: Crash magnitude as a function of the anticipation δ (α = 10)
Figure 2 provides the direct link between the magnitude of the crash and
the anticipation of the drop. Its main implication is that, for a fixed drop
of endowment, the higher the anticipation the higher the crash magnitude.
The intuition of this point is also given in the Introduction.
16
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. BUSINESS SUCCESS: WHAT FACTORS REALLY MATTER?
3. From Communication to Presence: Cognition, Emotions and Culture towards the Ultimate Communicative Experience. Festschrift in honor of Luigi Anolli
4. Uncertain Productivity Growth and the Choice between FDI and Export
5. Workforce or Workfare?
6. Improving the Impact of Market Reform on Agricultural Productivity in Africa: How Institutional Design Makes a Difference
7. FDI Implications of Recent European Court of Justice Decision on Corporation Tax Matters
8. Tastes, castes, and culture: The influence of society on preferences
9. Cross border cooperation –promoter of tourism development
10. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln