last point implies that the crash occurs independently of the true probability
of a drop next period, showing that the anticipation (together with the drop
of course) has driven the crash.
The next figure gives us a way to visualize the effect of drop anticipations
on the magnitude of a crash, given a particular drop of endowment next
period. We fix a 20% drop in the following simulation.

Figure 2: Crash magnitude as a function of the anticipation δ (α = 10)
Figure 2 provides the direct link between the magnitude of the crash and
the anticipation of the drop. Its main implication is that, for a fixed drop
of endowment, the higher the anticipation the higher the crash magnitude.
The intuition of this point is also given in the Introduction.
16
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Lumpy Investment, Sectoral Propagation, and Business Cycles
4. Fiscal Reform and Monetary Union in West Africa
5. Micro-strategies of Contextualization Cross-national Transfer of Socially Responsible Investment
6. Labour Market Institutions and the Personal Distribution of Income in the OECD
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Restricted Export Flexibility and Risk Management with Options and Futures
10. A Note on Costly Sequential Search and Oligopoly Pricing (new title: Truly Costly Sequential Search and Oligopolistic Pricing,)