last point implies that the crash occurs independently of the true probability
of a drop next period, showing that the anticipation (together with the drop
of course) has driven the crash.
The next figure gives us a way to visualize the effect of drop anticipations
on the magnitude of a crash, given a particular drop of endowment next
period. We fix a 20% drop in the following simulation.

Figure 2: Crash magnitude as a function of the anticipation δ (α = 10)
Figure 2 provides the direct link between the magnitude of the crash and
the anticipation of the drop. Its main implication is that, for a fixed drop
of endowment, the higher the anticipation the higher the crash magnitude.
The intuition of this point is also given in the Introduction.
16
More intriguing information
1. Demographic Features, Beliefs And Socio-Psychological Impact Of Acne Vulgaris Among Its Sufferers In Two Towns In Nigeria2. Regional dynamics in mountain areas and the need for integrated policies
3. Land Police in Mozambique: Future Perspectives
4. Delivering job search services in rural labour markets: the role of ICT
5. Recognizability of Individual Creative Style Within and Across Domains: Preliminary Studies
6. The name is absent
7. The magnitude and Cyclical Behavior of Financial Market Frictions
8. Crime as a Social Cost of Poverty and Inequality: A Review Focusing on Developing Countries
9. Regionale Wachstumseffekte der GRW-Förderung? Eine räumlich-ökonometrische Analyse auf Basis deutscher Arbeitsmarktregionen
10. Running head: CHILDREN'S ATTRIBUTIONS OF BELIEFS