last point implies that the crash occurs independently of the true probability
of a drop next period, showing that the anticipation (together with the drop
of course) has driven the crash.
The next figure gives us a way to visualize the effect of drop anticipations
on the magnitude of a crash, given a particular drop of endowment next
period. We fix a 20% drop in the following simulation.

Figure 2: Crash magnitude as a function of the anticipation δ (α = 10)
Figure 2 provides the direct link between the magnitude of the crash and
the anticipation of the drop. Its main implication is that, for a fixed drop
of endowment, the higher the anticipation the higher the crash magnitude.
The intuition of this point is also given in the Introduction.
16
More intriguing information
1. APPLICATIONS OF DUALITY THEORY TO AGRICULTURE2. The name is absent
3. The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -
4. Tastes, castes, and culture: The influence of society on preferences
5. Effects of red light and loud noise on the rate at which monkeys sample the sensory environment
6. The name is absent
7. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews
8. Heterogeneity of Investors and Asset Pricing in a Risk-Value World
9. The name is absent
10. On the job rotation problem