The name is absent



to a similar extent. Among these mainly suppliers are chosen as partners, but
partners on the same production level are chosen nearly as often. Slightly
more than half of the companies have joined a R&D co-operation with clients.

More than half of the companies covered by the study maintain contact with
universities or other research institutes for the purpose of exchanging informa-
tion and conjoint projects. Nevertheless there are significant differences be-
tween companies in Eastern and Western Germany which need to be pointed
out: R&D co-operations between firms and scientific organisations can be ob-
served more often among companies in the Eastern than in the Western part of
the country.

The distinction between various sizes of companies reveals differences in their
R&D co-operation behaviour. As mentioned in table 3, small enterprises in
Eastern Germany with a maximum of 19 employees are more often participat-
ing in R&D co-operations than those in Western Germany. This is also due to
the fact that companies of this size have a high share in the structure of firms in
Eastern Germany. On the other hand, the share of medium-sized enterprises in
Western Germany participating in R&D turns out to be higher than in the East-
ern part of Germany.

Table 3: Partners of companies with differing size, that join R&D co-opera-
tions in Eastern and Western Germany

Companies
with ... employees

Share of companies participating with ... in a
R&D co-operation (%)

other companies

research institutes

all organisations

Eastern
Germany1

Western

Germany2

Eastern
Germany1

Western
Germany2

Eastern
Germany1

Western

Germany2

up to 19

42.1

20.0

36.4

7.5

41.9

19.2

20 to 99

34.2

46.2

30.3

47.7

32.5

16.3

100 to 499

18.4

26.6

27.2

33.6

20.9

27.1

500 and more

5.3

7.2

6.1

11.2

4.7

7.4

Altogether
n = 233___________________________

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

100.0

© IfM Bonn

1 (2) including (excluding) West-Berlin

In order to estimate the status of R&D co-operations, the companies covered
by the study were asked to evaluate the role of their partnership for their com-
petitiveness. Most of these firms (85.4 %) assured that their R&D co-operation
is of importance for their future ability to compete. The majority of the compa-
nies (54.7 %) even considered their commitment to be of crucial importance for



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The Response of Ethiopian Grain Markets to Liberalization
3. BILL 187 - THE AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYEES PROTECTION ACT: A SPECIAL REPORT
4. Towards Learning Affective Body Gesture
5. Ruptures in the probability scale. Calculation of ruptures’ values
6. A Dynamic Model of Conflict and Cooperation
7. The Importance of Global Shocks for National Policymakers: Rising Challenges for Central Banks
8. European Integration: Some stylised facts
9. The name is absent
10. TWENTY-FIVE YEARS OF RESEARCH ON WOMEN FARMERS IN AFRICA: LESSONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS; WITH AN ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY
11. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods
12. Financial Development and Sectoral Output Growth in 19th Century Germany
13. Inflation Targeting and Nonlinear Policy Rules: The Case of Asymmetric Preferences (new title: The Fed's monetary policy rule and U.S. inflation: The case of asymmetric preferences)
14. Incorporating global skills within UK higher education of engineers
15. Financial Market Volatility and Primary Placements
16. The resources and strategies that 10-11 year old boys use to construct masculinities in the school setting
17. Industrial Cores and Peripheries in Brazil
18. Impact of Ethanol Production on U.S. and Regional Gasoline Prices and On the Profitability of U.S. Oil Refinery Industry
19. The name is absent
20. Personal Experience: A Most Vicious and Limited Circle!? On the Role of Entrepreneurial Experience for Firm Survival