Table 4: Logistic regression: Co-operation activities in R&D
|
marks |
regression |
expected |
significance |
|
residence of the enterprise (reference category: Bavaria) | |||
|
• Baden-Wurttemberg |
0.590 |
1.805 |
0.229 |
|
• North Rhine-Westphalia |
0.367 |
1.443 |
0.433 |
|
• Berlin and Brandenburg |
0.296 |
1.344 |
0.676 |
|
• Saarland and Rhineland-Palatinate |
0.072 |
1.075 |
0.937 |
|
• Hesse |
0.051 |
1.052 |
0.940 |
|
• Bremen and Lower Saxony |
-0.042 |
0.959 |
0.947 |
|
• Hamburg and Schleswig-Holstein |
-0.224 |
0.800 |
0.798 |
|
• Saxony |
-0.488 |
0.614 |
0.534 |
|
• Thuringia |
-0.613 |
0.542 |
0.527 |
|
• Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania and Saxony-Anhalt |
-1.424 |
0.241 |
0.270 |
|
industry (reference category: industry related services) | |||
|
• producer good industry |
-0.588 |
0,556 |
0.332 |
|
• investment good industry |
-0.999 |
0.368 |
0.066 |
|
• consumer good industry |
-1.075 |
0.341 |
0.061 |
|
• building industry |
-2.026 |
0.132 |
0.018 * |
|
structural marks / market performance | |||
|
• number of employees in 2000 (logarithm) |
0.610 |
1.841 |
0.000 *** |
|
• growth rate of employees 1999 till 2000 |
0.001 |
1.000 |
0.889 |
|
• high percentage of return on sales (above 5%) |
-0.104 |
0.901 |
0.755 |
|
• company is lead by owner |
-1.024 |
0.359 |
0.008 ** |
|
background / access to financial resources | |||
|
• experiences in co-operation with suppliers |
1.024 |
2.784 |
0.002 ** |
|
• experiences in co-operation with customers |
0.848 |
2.336 |
0.011 * |
|
• experiences in co-operation with other producers |
0.642 |
1.901 |
0.049 * |
|
• employee participation is practised |
0.576 |
1.779 |
0.094 |
|
• financial margin for investments above average |
-0.223 |
0.800 |
0.515 |
|
• teamwork is practised |
-0.391 |
0.676 |
0.251 |
|
R&D capacities / technological level of performance | |||
|
• share of R&D personnel on all employees |
2.812 |
16.637 |
0.049 * |
|
• use of new technology above branch average |
0.817 |
2.263 |
0.014 * |
|
• no own R&D personnel |
-0.965 |
0.381 |
0.022 * |
|
competitive situation | |||
|
• market share of primary product above average |
-0.123 |
0.884 |
0.713 |
|
• highly innovative in past |
-0.455 |
0.634 |
0.382 |
|
• innovative in past |
-0.570 |
0.566 |
0.176 |
|
• residence of main competitors in Germany |
-0.659 |
0.517 |
0.046 * |
More intriguing information
1. Response speeds of direct and securitized real estate to shocks in the fundamentals2. The name is absent
3. Human Resource Management Practices and Wage Dispersion in U.S. Establishments
4. he Effect of Phosphorylation on the Electron Capture Dissociation of Peptide Ions
5. The Mathematical Components of Engineering
6. The name is absent
7. TOWARDS THE ZERO ACCIDENT GOAL: ASSISTING THE FIRST OFFICER MONITOR AND CHALLENGE CAPTAIN ERRORS
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Palvelujen vienti ja kansainvälistyminen