defined presents some differences. 75% of the entrepreneurs of cluster 2 say that
learning effect does not exist or does not answer for opposition to cluster 1 with 53% of
the companies and cluster 3 with 56%.
The less innovative cluster (cluster 2) is the one that less appeal to the single region and
more to the national level for the training of the human resources carried through in the
region. Curiously is cluster 1 the one where more companies only appeal to the region
for the qualification of the human resources and it is the most involved cluster in
innovation the one where the companies are more attention for the trainees of the
region.
Relative the mobility of employees within the company, cluster 3 the one that less
devaluates this question (52% say yes, for opposition cluster 1 with 33% and cluster
2=46%). This situation again happeness for mobility of employees between companies
of the same sector. Relative to the cooperation (formal or informal) with local suppliers
and consumers, cluster 3 is the one that cooperates more with suppliers and with
customers to innovate.
Relative to individual learning, if the company was involved in activities of innovation,
if it appeals the training of the human resources and if it uses external services of
employees formation (internally or external to the company), definitively cluster 3,
presents the better values.
4.2.4- Systems of Governance
Accord Cooke (2003), the success of companies depends of the mechanisms of
coordination intra-organizational but also between the structure of regional governance.
Therefore, accord Lopes (2001) the dynamic of territorial governance configure one
virtual geographic space and promote synergies and the competitiveness.
The capacity to decide, adjust and regulate the territory depends of one competent and
efficient governance systems. These systems have one important role on territorial
innovation process through to the definition of projects, to regional politics and so in the
regulation and organization of the local activities.
20