Auctions in an outcome-based payment scheme to reward ecological services in agriculture – Conception, implementation and results



structure and relevant production conditions. Therefore the possibility for a higher
efficiency and a higher ecological use compared to an uniform premium is given. So the
orders can be assigned market-similarly on the basis of individual calculated offers to the
most efficient farmers. Moreover the use of auctions comprises financial incentives to
innovations and a more efficient employment of the factors of production. So farmers try
to reduce their costs of production and increase the possibility for an acceptance of bids in
future auctions.

4.2. The proving in the model-region

To make sure that this regional payment scheme is not just a theoretical construct, but
could be an institutional innovation as a part of the future agri-environmental policy it
needs to be tested. In January 2004 the empirical proving started in a model-region - the
administrative district Northeim in the south of Lower Saxony (Germany). Thereby the
realisation of the first bidding procedure and the production of the tender documents was
focused. This was accomplished in close contact with the responsible administration, in
order to prepare an efficient implementation into the practice. The public proclamation of
the auction took place on the 1st of June 2004. Afterwards in a period of six weeks the
farmers in the model-region could request the tender documents and make their offers. On
the 10th of July 2004 the offers were opened and evaluated by the project collaborators.
Until the 17th of July 2004 the commitments and denials were sent to the farmers and those
whose offers were accepted, were contracted to produce ecological goods according to
they offers. Each farmer had to deliver an individual offer for every plot of grassland. The
offer includes the choice of the ecological good (grassland I, II or III), the calculation of
the price per hectare and the exact description of the grassland plot on witch the ecological
goods exist or will be produced. This shows the specification of an auction. Farmers have
to calculate in an entrepreneurial way, orientated on their specific ecological production
conditions, witch leads to differentiated offers. The exclusion criteria in this first auction
were economic criteria based on the price per hectare and the ecological valuation took
place by the graduation of the ecological goods grassland I, II or III. The control of the
offered ecological goods will take place until the 31st of July 2005 and if the ecological
goods could be proved the way they were offered, farmers get paid in August 2005. Below
the most relevant results of the first bidding procedure and first empirical data from two
surveys in the administrative district Northeim will be presented.



More intriguing information

1. Iconic memory or icon?
2. The name is absent
3. Skill and work experience in the European knowledge economy
4. Federal Tax-Transfer Policy and Intergovernmental Pre-Commitment
5. Delivering job search services in rural labour markets: the role of ICT
6. Labour Market Institutions and the Personal Distribution of Income in the OECD
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Une Gestion des ressources humaines à l'interface des organisations : vers une GRH territoriale ?
10. The Impact of Minimum Wages on Wage Inequality and Employment in the Formal and Informal Sector in Costa Rica
11. The name is absent
12. A Principal Components Approach to Cross-Section Dependence in Panels
13. WP RR 17 - Industrial relations in the transport sector in the Netherlands
14. Secondary stress in Brazilian Portuguese: the interplay between production and perception studies
15. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
16. CURRENT CHALLENGES FOR AGRICULTURAL POLICY
17. Agricultural Policy as a Social Engineering Tool
18. Modeling industrial location decisions in U.S. counties
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent