Auctions in an outcome-based payment scheme to reward ecological services in agriculture – Conception, implementation and results



5. Results of the first auction

In the beginning of the first bidding procedure in April 2004, the Regional Advisory Board
decided about the demand for ecological goods and agreed that ecological goods in
grassland should be announced in the first auction. These ecological goods were classified
into grassland I, grassland II and grassland III, whereas grassland III represents the highest
quality of botanical diversity.

The tender documents were requested by 140 farmers in the model-region. 75 at
information meetings which took place in the beginning of the bidding procedure in June
2004 and 65 via telephone or e-mail. In the end 38 farmers with together 199 plots
delivered offers, which corresponds to a total area of 350,71 hectares. Three offers could
not find consideration since they had only been received after the offer period. Further
three offers were rejected, since they exhibited formal defects. Due to a limited budget of
30.000 € an acceptance of the tender could not be given to all offers. 28 farmers with
altogether 159 plots received an addition. This corresponds to an area of 288,56 hectares.
Differentiated by the ecological goods grassland I, II and III the results of the first auction
are shown in table 1.

Table 1: Results of the first auction.

Ecological Goods

Offered Plots

Accepted Plots

Price Area per hectare

Grassland I

148 (250,99 hectare)

109 (198,25 hectare)

40 - 250 € (0 98,63 €)

Grassland II

35 ( 61,24 hectare)

32 ( 53,33 hectare)

55 - 300 € (0 175,29 €)

Grassland III

18 ( 36,98 hectare)

18 ( 36,98 hectare)

100 - 350 € (0 202,78 €)

We can see, that for grassland I 148 plots were offered, from which 109 got accepted. This
corresponds with 198,25 hectares. The range of the advertising prices of all offers for
grassland I covers 40 to 250 € per hectare. At the ecological goods grassland II from 35
offered plots 32 were accepted, what corresponds to an area of 53,33 hectares. The range
of prices comprises 55 to 300 € per hectare. All 18 offered plots with a total area of 36,98
hectares were accepted at the ecological goods grassland III. The prises for grassland III
cover 100 to 350 €. The available budget was divided with 54 % to grassland I, 24 % to
grassland II and 22 % to grassland III.

10



More intriguing information

1. Testing for One-Factor Models versus Stochastic Volatility Models
2. The Provisions on Geographical Indications in the TRIPS Agreement
3. Nonlinear Production, Abatement, Pollution and Materials Balance Reconsidered
4. The name is absent
5. Firm Creation, Firm Evolution and Clusters in Chile’s Dynamic Wine Sector: Evidence from the Colchagua and Casablanca Regions
6. A Consistent Nonparametric Test for Causality in Quantile
7. Influence of Mucilage Viscosity On The Globule Structure And Stability Of Certain Starch Emulsions
8. Natural Resources: Curse or Blessing?
9. Heavy Hero or Digital Dummy: multimodal player-avatar relations in FINAL FANTASY 7
10. The name is absent
11. Innovation in commercialization of pelagic fish: the example of "Srdela Snack" Franchise
12. Protocol for Past BP: a randomised controlled trial of different blood pressure targets for people with a history of stroke of transient ischaemic attack (TIA) in primary care
13. DETERMINANTS OF FOOD AWAY FROM HOME AMONG AFRICAN-AMERICANS
14. Density Estimation and Combination under Model Ambiguity
15. SAEA EDITOR'S REPORT, FEBRUARY 1988
16. The name is absent
17. Labour Market Flexibility and Regional Unemployment Rate Dynamics: Spain (1980-1995)
18. AGRIBUSINESS EXECUTIVE EDUCATION AND KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE: NEW MECHANISMS OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT INVOLVING THE UNIVERSITY, PRIVATE FIRM STAKEHOLDERS AND PUBLIC SECTOR
19. Banking Supervision in Integrated Financial Markets: Implications for the EU
20. The name is absent