Monetary Policy News and Exchange Rate Responses: Do Only Surprises Matter?



not distinguish between news announcement and surprise component and they do not find evidence in
support of an immediate exchange rate response to monetary policy changes.

Adding to the debate on how quickly exchange rates respond to news, we find an absence of
delayed effects which strongly suggests that the exchange rates under study absorb monetary policy
surprises quickly and within the same day as the news are announced. Although our study employs
separate measures of the surprise, the expected component, and the news announcement itself and,
furthermore, we use a market based measure of expectations and thus avoid relying on survey data, our
findings in regards to the speed of the absorption of news are, nevertheless, consistent with the findings
presented in Andersen, Bollerslev, Diebold and Vega (2003) and Simpson, Ramchander and Chaudry
(2005). However, our evidence in favor of a quick absorption process is at odds with the findings of
Evans and Lyons (2005).

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 briefly discusses the data and the Fed
funds futures market. Section 3 presents the empirical analysis and results as well as several robustness
checks. Section 4 further discusses our results in light of other contributions and concludes.

2. Data

We focus our analysis on the 42 US monetary policy changes that occurred during the 1989 to 2000 time-
period and use Kuttner’s decomposition (Kuttner 2001) to isolate the surprise component of each of these
actual policy changes. Kuttner (2001) measures surprises associated with an actual monetary policy (i.e.
Fed funds target rate) change as the difference between the actual announcement and expectations, the
latter extracted from Fed funds futures data. Specifically, he uses daily spot-month Fed funds futures
market data for disentangling expected from unexpected changes. He argues that his method for
extracting the unexpected element of a target rate change generally “delivers a nearly pure measure of the
one-day surprise target change” (Kuttner, 2001, p. 529).

Fed funds futures have been trading at the Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) since October 1988.
Futures contracts with maturities of one through 24 months are listed, along with a current-month (spot-



More intriguing information

1. The effect of globalisation on industrial districts in Italy: evidence from the footwear sector
2. Sex differences in the structure and stability of children’s playground social networks and their overlap with friendship relations
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. WP 1 - The first part-time economy in the world. Does it work?
6. The Impact of EU Accession in Romania: An Analysis of Regional Development Policy Effects by a Multiregional I-O Model
7. PROJECTED COSTS FOR SELECTED LOUISIANA VEGETABLE CROPS - 1997 SEASON
8. The name is absent
9. Optimal Taxation of Capital Income in Models with Endogenous Fertility
10. Does adult education at upper secondary level influence annual wage earnings?
11. Existentialism: a Philosophy of Hope or Despair?
12. Correlates of Alcoholic Blackout Experience
13. THE INTERNATIONAL OUTLOOK FOR U.S. TOBACCO
14. Volunteering and the Strategic Value of Ignorance
15. SLA RESEARCH ON SELF-DIRECTION: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ISSUES
16. Gender stereotyping and wage discrimination among Italian graduates
17. MULTIMODAL SEMIOTICS OF SPIRITUAL EXPERIENCES: REPRESENTING BELIEFS, METAPHORS, AND ACTIONS
18. IMPROVING THE UNIVERSITY'S PERFORMANCE IN PUBLIC POLICY EDUCATION
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent