Appendices
Appendix 1. The probabilistic voting model with a public sector lobby
In this appendix we derive equation (2.19) giving the optimal lobby campaign
efforts and equation (2.20) determining the probability that political party A will
win the election.
According to (2.16) the lobby swing voter who is indifferent between the two
parties has the ideological bias
ρi = UiA - UiB - ωe .
(A.1)
All lobby members with a value of ρij less than ρi will prefer party A to party
B .Ifρij is uniformly distributed on the interval
fraction πiA of lobby members with a value of ρij less than ρi is
2φi, 2φi with length 1M, the
πiA
' = Φi (* + ⅛) = Φi (UA-UB-ω + ⅛)∙
(A.2)
1∕φi ∖ 2φ√ ∖ 2φi∕
Using (2.17) to eliminate ωe from (A.2), we may thus write the probability that a
lobby member will vote for party A as
πA =q+ φi £UiA - UB - ω + αih (ZA - ZB)] . (A.3)
2
In a similar way, if the individual ideological preference of an outsider (ρov) follows
a uniform distribution on the interval
1 1
2φo , 2φo
the probability πoA that an
outsider will vote for party A can be shown to be
πA = + + φo £UoA - UB - ω + αih (ZA - ZB)] . (A.4)
2
Thus the expected fraction of total votes that will be cast in favour of party is
πA = αiπiA +(1- αi) πoA.
(A.5)
31
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Job quality and labour market performance
4. The name is absent
5. Neural Network Modelling of Constrained Spatial Interaction Flows
6. Consciousness, cognition, and the hierarchy of context: extending the global neuronal workspace model
7. FDI Implications of Recent European Court of Justice Decision on Corporation Tax Matters
8. The name is absent
9. Behaviour-based Knowledge Systems: An Epigenetic Path from Behaviour to Knowledge
10. The changing face of Chicago: demographic trends in the 1990s