G-DAE Working Paper No. 03-01: “Read My Lips: More New Tax Cuts”
Table A1. Taxable Income and Filing Status, by AGI Category
|
AGI |
Avg. Taxable Income per |
2002 Maximum Marginal |
1999 Distribution by |
Estimated | ||||
|
Single |
Married, |
Married, |
Single |
Married, |
Married, | |||
|
No AGI |
$0 |
0% |
0% |
0% |
49.0% |
39.8% |
11.2% |
0.0% |
|
$1 under $5,000 |
$995 |
10% |
10% |
10% |
85.4% |
5.0% |
9.6% |
10.0% |
|
$5k under $10k |
$2,181 |
10% |
10% |
10% |
68.6% |
10.4% |
21.0% |
10.0% |
|
$10k under $15k |
$4,680 |
10% |
10% |
10% |
56.4% |
16.6% |
27.0% |
10.0% |
|
$15k under $20k |
$7,154 |
15% |
10% |
15% |
49.9% |
23.5% |
26.6% |
13.8% |
|
$20k under $25k |
$11,271 |
15% |
10% |
15% |
48.3% |
27.1% |
24.7% |
13.6% |
|
$25k under $30k |
$15,499 |
15% |
15% |
15% |
48.8% |
30.1% |
21.1% |
15.0% |
|
$30k under $40k |
$21,586 |
15% |
15% |
15% |
42.1% |
40.2% |
17.7% |
15.0% |
|
$40k under $50k |
$29,412 |
27% |
15% |
27% |
32.1% |
54.6% |
13.3% |
20.4% |
|
$50k under $75k |
$42,569 |
27% |
15% |
27% |
21.0% |
71.9% |
7.1% |
18.4% |
|
$75k under $100k |
$62,626 |
27% |
27% |
30% |
13.1% |
83.0% |
3.9% |
27.1% |
|
$100k under $200k |
$101,734 |
30% |
27% |
30% |
11.2% |
86.0% |
2.8% |
27.4% |
|
$200k under $500k |
$244,699 |
35% |
35% |
35% |
11.4% |
85.6% |
2.9% |
35.0% |
|
$500k under $1m |
$605,947 |
38.6% |
38.6% |
38.6% |
12.4% |
84.4% |
3.2% |
38.6% |
|
$1m under $1.5m |
$1,092,724 |
38.6% |
38.6% |
38.6% |
13.1% |
83.0% |
3.8% |
38.6% |
|
$1.5m under $2m |
$1,563,955 |
38.6% |
38.6% |
38.6% |
13.1% |
83.0% |
3.8% |
38.6% |
|
$2m under $5m |
$2,720,958 |
38.6% |
38.6% |
38.6% |
13.1% |
83.0% |
3.8% |
38.6% |
|
$5m under $10m |
$6,244,602 |
38.6% |
38.6% |
38.6% |
13.1% |
83.0% |
3.8% |
38.6% |
|
$10m or more |
$24,010,714 |
38.6% |
38.6% |
38.6% |
13.1% |
83.0% |
3.8% |
38.6% |
24 Data from “Individual Income Tax Returns, 2000” by David Campbell and Michael Parisi, IRS Statistics
of Income Bulletin, Fall 2002.
16
More intriguing information
1. Should Local Public Employment Services be Merged with the Local Social Benefit Administrations?2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. DISCRIMINATORY APPROACH TO AUDITORY STIMULI IN GUINEA FOWL (NUMIDA MELEAGRIS) AFTER HYPERSTRIATAL∕HIPPOCAMP- AL BRAIN DAMAGE
7. The name is absent
8. Wirkung einer Feiertagsbereinigung des Länderfinanzausgleichs: eine empirische Analyse des deutschen Finanzausgleichs
9. School Effectiveness in Developing Countries - A Summary of the Research Evidence
10. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods