|
Table 2 Summary statistics of foreign farm workforce, NAWS, 1989-2006___________________ | ||||||
|
_____N=19152 workers |
______N1=8097 workers |
_____N0=11055 workers | ||||
|
Variable |
Mean |
Standard Deviation |
Mean |
Standard Deviation |
Mean |
Standard Deviation |
|
Lnwage Weeks Spent |
2.0351 |
0.2513 |
2.0876 |
0.2603 |
1.9966 |
0.2372 |
|
Abroad |
6.6531 |
12.2887 |
3.7974 |
8.4420 |
8.7447 |
14.1097 |
|
Specialty Crop |
0.7986 |
0.4011 |
0.8176 |
0.3862 |
0.7846 |
0.4111 |
|
Adult Education |
0.2007 |
0.4005 |
0.2812 |
0.4496 |
0.1417 |
0.3487 |
|
After 1986 |
0.6148 |
0.4867 |
0.2577 |
0.4374 |
0.8763 |
0.3293 |
|
After 2001 |
0.5198 |
0.4996 |
0.4763 |
0.4995 |
0.5517 |
0.4973 |
|
Female |
0.1615 |
0.3680 |
0.1860 |
0.3891 |
0.1436 |
0.3507 |
|
Married |
0.6314 |
0.4824 |
0.7866 |
0.4097 |
0.5177 |
0.4997 |
|
English |
1.7231 |
0.8278 |
2.0042 |
0.9055 |
1.5172 |
0.6974 |
|
Mexican |
0.8873 |
0.3163 |
0.8697 |
0.3366 |
0.9001 |
0.2998 |
|
Education |
5.9630 |
3.2826 |
5.7599 |
3.4046 |
6.1118 |
3.1821 |
|
Experience |
10.4756 |
9.0697 |
16.6972 |
9.1572 |
5.9188 |
5.6548 |
|
Age Farm Work Done |
33.7474 |
11.8152 |
39.9809 |
11.3513 |
29.1819 |
9.9084 |
|
Last Year Years Since |
7.4226 |
4.3196 |
8.6284 |
3.3334 |
6.5394 |
4.7268 |
|
Immigration Year With |
11.9724 |
10.0984 |
19.1250 |
9.4763 |
6.7336 |
6.7813 |
|
Employer |
4.5438 |
4.8579 |
6.8092 |
6.1175 |
2.8846 |
2.6388 |
|
California |
0.3957 |
0.4890 |
0.5081 |
0.5000 |
0.3134 |
0.4639 |
|
Grower |
0.8003 |
0.3998 |
0.8185 |
0.3855 |
0.7871 |
0.4094 |
|
Piece Rate |
0.1839 |
0.3875 |
0.1601 |
0.3667 |
0.2014 |
0.4011 |
|
Seasonal Worker Farm Work |
0.6873 |
0.4636 |
0.6698 |
0.4703 |
0.7002 |
0.4582 |
|
Weeks Foreign Farm |
36.4671 |
14.5541 |
37.7998 |
12.8602 |
35.4910 |
15.6077 |
|
Work Experience |
0.6830 |
0.4653 |
0.6684 |
0.4708 |
0.6936 |
0.4610 |
23
More intriguing information
1. Nonparametric cointegration analysis2. Mergers under endogenous minimum quality standard: a note
3. The Demand for Specialty-Crop Insurance: Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard
4. Integration, Regional Specialization and Growth Differentials in EU Acceding Countries: Evidence from Hungary
5. The name is absent
6. The Complexity Era in Economics
7. Temporary Work in Turbulent Times: The Swedish Experience
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Rural-Urban Economic Disparities among China’s Elderly