based on observable characteristics (x), and the participation decision for a program may be
defined as:
Y1 = g1(x)+ u1 = β1'Xi + u1 (treated/p articipant group)
Y0 = g0(x)+ u0 = β0'Xi + u0 (untreated /nonpartic ipant group)
(1)
D* = α'Zi + ε (decision to participat e in treatment)
where D = 1 if D* ≥ 0; D = 0 otherwise
In this setup,g1 (x) , g0(x) represent the relationship between the observable characteristics and
the potential outcomes and u1,u0 ,ε , Z and x are unobserved and observed random variables,
respectively. The errors are assumed to be independent of x and Z. Ceteris paribus, the
treatment or causal effect is defined as shown by equation (4.2), and is the difference between
the potential outcomes:
∆i =Y1i-Y0i i = 1,..., N (2)
This effect is not directly estimable as it is impossible to simultaneously observe an individual in
both states. The observed outcome is actually:
Yi = DiY1i +(1-Di)Y0i (3)
where the unobservable portion of the effect is referred to as the counterfactual outcome. (For
those individuals receiving treatment Y0 is the counterfactual outcome; for those who do not, Y1
is the counterfactual outcome.) The treatment effect of each person is independent of the
treatment of other individuals, implying that an individual’s potential outcomes are affected by
his participation decision only and not the decisions of other individuals (Wooldridge, 2002;
Caliendo, 2006).
Gains from treatment are typically defined as population averages. Some relevant
parameters include:
More intriguing information
1. Prizes and Patents: Using Market Signals to Provide Incentives for Innovations2. Spatial agglomeration and business groups: new evidence from Italian industrial districts
3. Long-Term Capital Movements
4. Public infrastructure capital, scale economies and returns to variety
5. AN ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF THE COLORADO RIVER BASIN SALINITY CONTROL PROGRAM
6. Income Mobility of Owners of Small Businesses when Boundaries between Occupations are Vague
7. The name is absent
8. Ongoing Emergence: A Core Concept in Epigenetic Robotics
9. Multimedia as a Cognitive Tool
10. MULTIPLE COMPARISONS WITH THE BEST: BAYESIAN PRECISION MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY RANKINGS