PROPOSED IMMIGRATION POLICY REFORM & FARM LABOR MARKET OUTCOMES



Average Treatment Effect (ATE). This is the expected gain from participating in a
program for a randomly chosen individual (Heckman, Tobias and Vytlacil, 2001),
calculated as the differences in expected outcomes before and after treatment:
αATE =E()=E(Y1)-E(Y0)                                                   (4)

Average Treatment Effect on the Treated (ATET). This is the average gain from
treatment for those who select into the treatment (Heckman, Tobias and Vytlacil, 2001):
aATET = E (D = 1 )= E(YlD = 1 )-E (Y0D = 1 )                            (5)

Average Treatment Effect on the Untreated (ATEU). This is the effect for non-
participants which may be useful for future policy decisions on extending treatment to
groups that were excluded from treatment (Caliendo, 2006):

αATEU =E(D=0)=E(Y1D=0)-E(Y0 D=0)                           (6)

Marginal Treatment Effect (MTE). 1 This is the expected effect of treatment conditional
on observed
(X) and unobserved (Ud) characteristics of participants (Heckman and
Vytlacil, 2005).
2 One interpretation is that it is the mean gain for an individual with
characteristics
X and unobservables Ud such that he is indifferent between treatment or

not given a set of Z values, z, where Φ(α ,z)=ud. It is defined as:

MTE(X,Ud)E(X=x,Ud=ud)=E(Y1-Y0X=x,Udi=ud)

(7)


=E(γX =x,Udi =ud)=X(β10)+E[u1i-u0i Udi =ud]

The challenge posed by selection bias is evident from the ATET which shows a
hypothetical outcome in the absence of treatment for those individuals who received treatment
(Caliendo, 2006). With non-experimental data, this outcome is not equivalent to the outcome of
non-participants:

E (Yo D = 1)E (Yo D = 0)                                                       (8)

Selection bias may arise since participants and non-participants may be deliberately selected
groups with different outcomes, even in the absence of treatment, due to observable and
unobservable factors that may determine participation (Caliendo, 2006):

E(Y1 |D=1)-E(Y0 |D=0)=E(Y1-Y0 |D=1)+[E(Y0 |D=1)-E(Y0 |D=0)]       (9)

k                V                j k                            V                            j

ATET            Selection bias

1 Bjorklund and Moffitt (1987) are credited with introducing this concept to the literature.

2 The unobserved characteristics are introduced into the model by the decision rule described by equation (1).



More intriguing information

1. The Role of area-yield crop insurance program face to the Mid-term Review of Common Agricultural Policy
2. The Effects of Reforming the Chinese Dual-Track Price System
3. Putting Globalization and Concentration in the Agri-food Sector into Context
4. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods
5. Passing the burden: corporate tax incidence in open economies
6. The name is absent
7. Fighting windmills? EU industrial interests and global climate negotiations
8. The name is absent
9. Heterogeneity of Investors and Asset Pricing in a Risk-Value World
10. Strengthening civil society from the outside? Donor driven consultation and participation processes in Poverty Reduction Strategies (PRSP): the Bolivian case
11. Standards behaviours face to innovation of the entrepreneurships of Beira Interior
12. The name is absent
13. The name is absent
14. The name is absent
15. Public Debt Management in Brazil
16. The name is absent
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. THE AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LABORATORY
20. The Impact of Hosting a Major Sport Event on the South African Economy