Table 2. Average Returns to Variable-Rate Application of Nitrogen and Water (RVRT*) for
Selected Management Zone Proportions
|
Proportion of Field____________ |
______________________Average RVRT* a________________________ | ||
|
Management Zone 1 |
Management Zone 2 |
Management Zone 3 | |
|
0 |
$44.41 |
$2.92 |
$10.72 |
|
0.1 |
$41.74 |
$41.59 |
$22.14 |
|
0.2 |
$38.92 |
$50.33 |
$31.69 |
|
0.3 |
$35.91 |
$50.36 |
$39.60 |
|
0.4 |
$35.71 |
$47.93 |
$42.54 |
|
0.5 |
$29.19 |
$40.94 |
$50.25 |
|
0.6 |
$25.33 |
$34.04 |
$52.25 |
|
0.7 |
$20.97 |
$26.34 |
$50.98 |
|
0.8 |
$15.86 |
$18.05 |
$44.80 |
|
0.9_______________ |
__________________$9.43 |
_________________$9.26 |
_______________$30.45 |
a Average RVRT*, represented by the fixed λ in the first column and the management zone in
the column, is determined by averaging the RVRT*s for fields with all combinations of the
other twoλ s. For instance, the $9.43/acre return in the column headed Management Zone 1 is
the average return when the field is 90% management zone 1 and either 10% management zone
2 ($16.38/acre) or 10% management zone 3 ($2.37/acre).
16
More intriguing information
1. CURRENT CHALLENGES FOR AGRICULTURAL POLICY2. Initial Public Offerings and Venture Capital in Germany
3. Analyzing the Agricultural Trade Impacts of the Canada-Chile Free Trade Agreement
4. From Aurora Borealis to Carpathians. Searching the Road to Regional and Rural Development
5. Industrial districts, innovation and I-district effect: territory or industrial specialization?
6. Midwest prospects and the new economy
7. The name is absent
8. ¿Por qué se privatizan servicios en los municipios (pequeños)? Evidencia empírica sobre residuos sólidos y agua.
9. Voting by Committees under Constraints
10. Solidaristic Wage Bargaining