INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES



64


DAVID T. LYKKEN AND AUKE TELLEGEN

time when the respondent first concluded that the spouse
would be her or his choice. If mate selection is a lawful process,
then the same individual who has recently selected one
of a pair
of MZ twins ought to feel at that time a substantial attraction to
the MZ
cotwin. If mate selection depends on some set of rather
general demographic, physical, and psychological characteris-
tics of the chosen (as well as on the characteristics of the
chooser which, in this case, are held constant), then the fiancee
or fiance of one DZ twin, similarly, ought to feel a weaker but
significant bias in favor of the DZ
cotwin who shares half his or
her spouse-to-be’s genes plus family environment, ethnicity,
and socioeconomic status.

Method

A slightly different questionnaire was sent in the same mailing with
the Choices questionnaire to each twin’s spouse. This also included
five questions with five answer alternatives. The first three questions
asked each spouse to compare the twins’ choices in clothing, house-
hold furnishings, and vacations, just as in the twins’ own question-
naire. The spouses also were asked to evaluate the twins’ similarity in
their choices of friends. Finally, each spouse was asked to report his or
her feelings about their spouse’s
cotwin when they first got acquainted.
Once again, confidentiality was emphasized and the spouses were
asked not to show their answers to their twin spouse but to seal them in
a provided envelope and return them to us. The data were analyzed as
for the previous questionnaire and are presented in Table 5.

Results

The data in Table 5 generally confirm the proposition that
MZ twins tend to be similar in most of their choice behavior,
not only by their own report but also as reported by a spouse.
There are some differences. Male twins, according to
their
wives, are not as similar in their choices of household furnish-
ings as female twins are reported to be by their husbands. It
seems reasonable to infer that wives tend to have more say in
household furnishing than husbands do. Conversely, male twins
are more similar than female twins in their choice of vacations,
at least as reported by their respective spouses. We infer that, in
this population, the men tend to have more say than the women
do in selecting vacation activities. The spouses of both sexes
consider that the MZ twins tend to have a preponderance of
similar friends, and fewer spouses of MZ than of DZ twins rate
the twins’ friends as dissimilar.

On the question about mate selection, we find two striking
differences from the results in Table 4. The first, that nearly

Table 5

Percentages of Evaluations by the Spouses of Adult Twins of the Similarity in the Twins’ Choice
of Clothes, Household Furnishings, Vacation Activities, and Friends

and the Spouses’ Attitudes Toward Their Spouse’s Cotwin

Variable

Husbands of

Wives of

Total

MZ

DZ

MZ

DZ

MZ

DZ

Wardrobes

Similara

62    >

I

37

65

>

1

42

63

I

>
1

39

Dissimilar

I

28 c

43

17

36

I
23

1

40

Household furnishings

Similar

39    >

23

I

. 36

>

19

I

36

I

>

21

I

Dissimilar

21     <

I
39

30

I
33

I

28

<;

I
37

Vacation activities

Similar

41

31

I

54

>

26

I

47

I

>

29

I

Dissimilar

33    <

I

48

27

I
50

I
30

<;

I
49

Friends

Similar

43

I

38

46

I

>

21

I

44

>

30

Dissimilar

I
30    <

44

I
28

I
48

26

4:

Attitude toward spouse’s

COtwin when first met

Likedb

42    >

'I

36

>

'I

39

>

25

21     <

38

36

52

30

<;

I

Disliked
n of spouses

131

121

102

99

233

44

220

Note. I = Percentages rating “similar” vs. “dissimilar” or “liked” vs. “disliked” differ at p < .05 by
chi-square test. > or < = monozygotic (MZ) and dizygotic (DZ) percentages differ at
p <. ,05.

• Scale was almost identical-quite similar-average-not similar-very different-can’t answer. “Similar” =
percentage of respondents choosing the first two alternatives; “dissimilar” = percentage choosing not
similar or very different. b Scale was could have fallen for my twin-in-law-really liked my twin-in-law-no
strong feeling-would not have chosen my twin-in-law-would rather have stayed single-can’t answer.

“Liked” = percentage of respondents choosing could have fallen for my twin-in-law or really liked my
twin-in-law; “Disliked” = percentage choosing would not have chosen my twin-in-law or would rather have
stayed single.



More intriguing information

1. The Folklore of Sorting Algorithms
2. The name is absent
3. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods
4. The name is absent
5. Cyber-pharmacies and emerging concerns on marketing drugs Online
6. The WTO and the Cartagena Protocol: International Policy Coordination or Conflict?
7. Regionale Wachstumseffekte der GRW-Förderung? Eine räumlich-ökonometrische Analyse auf Basis deutscher Arbeitsmarktregionen
8. Strategic Investment and Market Integration
9. The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -
10. Secondary stress in Brazilian Portuguese: the interplay between production and perception studies
11. The name is absent
12. The name is absent
13. A methodological approach in order to support decision-makers when defining Mobility and Transportation Politics
14. Who’s afraid of critical race theory in education? a reply to Mike Cole’s ‘The color-line and the class struggle’
15. What Contribution Can Residential Field Courses Make to the Education of 11-14 Year-olds?
16. A Note on Productivity Change in European Co-operative Banks: The Luenberger Indicator Approach
17. Impacts of Tourism and Fiscal Expenditure on Remote Islands in Japan: A Panel Data Analysis
18. The name is absent
19. Centre for Longitudinal Studies
20. ‘Goodwill is not enough’