The name is absent



TABELA 3 - Decomposiçào do retomo de ICMS para о municipio de Matelândia, 2000 a 2004 (preços correntes).

Organizaçèes Rurais & Agroindustriais, Lavras, v. 8, n. 3, p. 295-312, 2006

Critérios

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

Total Acumulado

Reto rno
(RS)

%

Total

Retomo
(RS)

%

Total

Reto rno
(RS)

%

Total

Reto rno
(RS)

%

Total

Retorno
(RS)

%

Total

Retorno
(RS)

%

Total

1. Valor Adicionado

1.065.565,83

27,54

1.111.995,10

28,68

1.314.601,33

32,33

1.773.378,90

39,36

2.326.155,08

43,97

7.591.696,23

35,13

1.1 Inddstria

164.679,06

4,26

202.487,66

5,22

422.244,78

10,38

805.479,08

17,88

1.049.960,95

19,84

2.644.851,53

12,24

1.1.1 LAR

0,00

0,00

63.366,32

1,63

240.205,27

5,91

667.967,97

14,83

862.491,23

16,30

1.834.030,79

8,49

1.1.2 Outras

164.679,06

4,26

139.121,34

3,59

182.039,52

4,48

137.511,10

3,05

187.469,71

3,54

810.820,73

3,75

1.2 Comércio

241.811,33

6,25

268.175,08

6,92

279.173,72

6,87

272.875,30

6,06

314.967,35

5,95

1.377.002,78

6,37

1.3 Produçào
Primaria

643.055,90

16,62

634.698,07

16,37

592.977,57

14,58

686.337,81

15,23

959.433,33

18,13

3.516.502,68

16,27

1.3.1 LAR

0,00

0,00

8.565,35

0,22

104.286,95

2,56

161.800,30

3,59

263.674,98

4,98

538.327,58

2,49

1.3.2 Outras

643.055,90

16,62

626.132,74

16,15

488.690,62

12,02

524.537,51

11,64

695.758,34

13,15

2.978.175,12

13,78

1.4 Açôes
Fiscais/outros

16.019,52

0,41

6.634,29

0,17

20.205,27

0,50

8.686,71

0,19

1.793,45

0,03

53.339,24

0,25

2. Produçào
Agropecuaria

411.088,07

10,62

450.357,74

11,61

521.231,81

12,82

615.102,03

13,65

641.489,97

12,12

2.639.269,63

12,21

2.1 LAR

165.262,02

4,27

185.209,89

4,78

208.088,03

5,12

246.924,67

5,48

277.696,06

5,25

1.083.180,67

5,01

2.2 Outras

245.826,05

6,35

265.147,85

6,84

313.143,78

7,70

368.177,36

8,17

363.793,91

6,88

1.556.088,96

7,20

3. Populaçào Rural

215.074,54

5,56

222.237,04

5,73

242.816,08

5,97

262.615,82

5,83

286.413,35

5,41

1.229.156,82

5,69

4. Propriedades
Rurais

98.677,34

2,55

103.726,27

2,67

100.099,89

2,46

97.408,50

2,16

105.901,72

2,00

505.813,71

2,34

5. Area Territorial

106.842,41

2,76

110.399,16

2,85

110.766,47

2,72

119.884,31

2,66

130.655,71

2,47

578.548,07

2,68

6. FatorAmbiental

1.889.304,15

48,83

1.793.369,62

46,25

1.691.063,74

41,59

1.543.991,00

34,27

1.698.841,52

32,11

8.616.570,03

39,87

7. Distribuiçào
Igualitaria

82.882,14

2,14

85.642,32

2,21

85.927,26

2,11

92.999,52

2,06

101.426,88

1,92

448.878,12

2,08

8. TOTAIS

(soma 1-7)

3.869.434,48 100,00

3.877.727,25 100,00

4.066.506,58

100,00

4.505.380,06

100,00

5.290.884,24

100,00 21.609.932,60

100,00

9. Resumo da

Participaçào da LAR

165.262,02

4,27

257.141,56

6,63

552.580,25

13,59

1.076.692,94

23,90

1.403.862,27

26,53

3.455.539,04

16,00

A inserçào econômica da Cooperativa agroindustrial...                           303

Fonte: Resultados da Pesquisa.



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?
3. Deprivation Analysis in Declining Inner City Residential Areas: A Case Study From Izmir, Turkey.
4. Ex post analysis of the regional impacts of major infrastructure: the Channel Tunnel 10 years on.
5. The Role of Evidence in Establishing Trust in Repositories
6. Apprenticeships in the UK: from the industrial-relation via market-led and social inclusion models
7. The name is absent
8. Der Einfluß der Direktdemokratie auf die Sozialpolitik
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent