Prime
1 if the individual was the primary household shopper and 0
otherwise
Organic = 1 if the individual frequently purchases organic produce and
0 otherwise
Media = 1 if the individual made frequent use of food advertisements
and coupons in newspapers and 0 otherwise
Education = 1 if the individual had not completed at least a bachelors
degree and 0 otherwise
Hi_Income = 1 if the household income was at least $70,000 and 0
otherwise
For estimation purposes, one classification was eliminated from each group of
variables to prevent perfect collinearity. The base group of individuals and omitted
variables are given in Table 1. Based on previous literature, females (Nayga; Bender
and Derby, 1992; Guthrie et al.) and households with children (Feick, Harrmann, and
Warland, 1986; Guthrie et al.) were initially hypothesized to be most likely to be label
users. Older individuals were expected to be less likely to be nutritional label users
(Bender and Derby).
Data Description
The data for this analysis was collected from a survey conducted by Rutgers
Cooperative Extension. The survey was administered at five grocery retailers
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Innovation and business performance - a provisional multi-regional analysis
3. Multi-Agent System Interaction in Integrated SCM
4. BUSINESS SUCCESS: WHAT FACTORS REALLY MATTER?
5. Trade Openness and Volatility
6. Dual Inflation Under the Currency Board: The Challenges of Bulgarian EU Accession
7. ISO 9000 -- A MARKETING TOOL FOR U.S. AGRIBUSINESS
8. Poverty transition through targeted programme: the case of Bangladesh Poultry Model
9. The Employment Impact of Differences in Dmand and Production
10. The Macroeconomic Determinants of Volatility in Precious Metals Markets