Table 3. Saha's argument on the NLMS model
____DRRA |
CRRA |
_____IRRA | |
DARA |
θ > 1, θ > γ |
θ > 1, θ = γ |
θ > 1, θ < γ |
CARA |
θ=1, θ>γ |
θ=1, θ=γ |
θ=1, θ<γ |
IARA |
θ<1,θ>γ |
θ<1, θ=γ |
θ<1,θ<γ |
Source: Saha (1997)
Table 4. Reconsideration of the NLMS model
_____DRRA |
CRRA |
_____IRRA | |
DARA |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
Not applicable |
CARA |
Not feasible |
Not feasible |
θ=1, θ<γ |
IARA |
Not feasible |
Not feasible |
θ<1,1≤γ |
Table 5. Form (15) and the corresponding types of risk aversion
_____DRRA____ |
CRRA |
_____IRRA | |
DARA |
Not applicable |
1 < δ = η |
1 < δ < η |
CARA |
Not feasible |
Not feasible |
1=δ<η |
IARA |
______Not feasible |
Not feasible |
Not applicable |
33
More intriguing information
1. Target Acquisition in Multiscale Electronic Worlds2. CGE modelling of the resources boom in Indonesia and Australia using TERM
3. Credit Market Competition and Capital Regulation
4. Regionale Wachstumseffekte der GRW-Förderung? Eine räumlich-ökonometrische Analyse auf Basis deutscher Arbeitsmarktregionen
5. Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?
6. TOWARDS THE ZERO ACCIDENT GOAL: ASSISTING THE FIRST OFFICER MONITOR AND CHALLENGE CAPTAIN ERRORS
7. Explaining Growth in Dutch Agriculture: Prices, Public R&D, and Technological Change
8. Structural Influences on Participation Rates: A Canada-U.S. Comparison
9. The name is absent
10. WP 1 - The first part-time economy in the world. Does it work?