The name is absent

Table 3. Saha's argument on the NLMS model

	____DRRA	CRRA	_____IRRA
DARA	θ > 1, θ > γ	θ > 1, θ = γ	θ > 1, θ < γ
CARA	θ=1, θ>γ	θ=1, θ=γ	θ=1, θ<γ
IARA	θ<1,θ>γ	θ<1, θ=γ	θ<1,θ<γ

Source: Saha (1997)

Table 4. Reconsideration of the NLMS model

	_____DRRA	CRRA	_____IRRA
DARA	Not applicable	Not applicable	Not applicable
CARA	Not feasible	Not feasible	θ=1, θ<γ
IARA	Not feasible	Not feasible	θ<1,1≤γ

Table 5. Form (15) and the corresponding types of risk aversion

	_____DRRA____	CRRA	_____IRRA
DARA	Not applicable	1 < δ = η	1 < δ < η
CARA	Not feasible	Not feasible	1=δ<η
IARA	______Not feasible	Not feasible	Not applicable

33

More intriguing information

1. The duration of fixed exchange rate regimes
2. Publication of Foreign Exchange Statistics by the Central Bank of Chile
3. An Economic Analysis of Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Implications for Overweight and Obesity among Higher- and Lower-Income Consumers
4. The Dictator and the Parties A Study on Policy Co-operation in Mineral Economies
5. Electricity output in Spain: Economic analysis of the activity after liberalization
6. The name is absent
7. Antidote Stocking at Hospitals in North Palestine
8. The quick and the dead: when reaction beats intention
9. THE CO-EVOLUTION OF MATTER AND CONSCIOUSNESS1
10. For Whom is MAI? A theoretical Perspective on Multilateral Agreements on Investments