The name is absent



Table 3. Saha's argument on the NLMS model

____DRRA

CRRA

_____IRRA

DARA

θ > 1, θ > γ

θ > 1, θ = γ

θ > 1, θ < γ

CARA

θ=1, θ>γ

θ=1, θ=γ

θ=1, θ<γ

IARA

θ<1,θ>γ

θ<1, θ=γ

θ<1,θ<γ

Source: Saha (1997)

Table 4. Reconsideration of the NLMS model

_____DRRA

CRRA

_____IRRA

DARA

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

CARA

Not feasible

Not feasible

θ=1, θ<γ

IARA

Not feasible

Not feasible

θ<1,1≤γ

Table 5. Form (15) and the corresponding types of risk aversion

_____DRRA____

CRRA

_____IRRA

DARA

Not applicable

1 < δ = η

1 < δ < η

CARA

Not feasible

Not feasible

1=δ<η

IARA

______Not feasible

Not feasible

Not applicable

33



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?
5. Sectoral Energy- and Labour-Productivity Convergence
6. The name is absent
7. Fertility in Developing Countries
8. LIMITS OF PUBLIC POLICY EDUCATION
9. The Modified- Classroom ObservationScheduletoMeasureIntenticnaCommunication( M-COSMIC): EvaluationofReliabilityandValidity
10. The name is absent