The name is absent



Table 3. Saha's argument on the NLMS model

____DRRA

CRRA

_____IRRA

DARA

θ > 1, θ > γ

θ > 1, θ = γ

θ > 1, θ < γ

CARA

θ=1, θ>γ

θ=1, θ=γ

θ=1, θ<γ

IARA

θ<1,θ>γ

θ<1, θ=γ

θ<1,θ<γ

Source: Saha (1997)

Table 4. Reconsideration of the NLMS model

_____DRRA

CRRA

_____IRRA

DARA

Not applicable

Not applicable

Not applicable

CARA

Not feasible

Not feasible

θ=1, θ<γ

IARA

Not feasible

Not feasible

θ<1,1≤γ

Table 5. Form (15) and the corresponding types of risk aversion

_____DRRA____

CRRA

_____IRRA

DARA

Not applicable

1 < δ = η

1 < δ < η

CARA

Not feasible

Not feasible

1=δ<η

IARA

______Not feasible

Not feasible

Not applicable

33



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. School Effectiveness in Developing Countries - A Summary of the Research Evidence
3. A multistate demographic model for firms in the province of Gelderland
4. Macro-regional evaluation of the Structural Funds using the HERMIN modelling framework
5. Insecure Property Rights and Growth: The Roles of Appropriation Costs, Wealth Effects, and Heterogeneity
6. PEER-REVIEWED FINAL EDITED VERSION OF ARTICLE PRIOR TO PUBLICATION
7. A Dynamic Model of Conflict and Cooperation
8. Pass-through of external shocks along the pricing chain: A panel estimation approach for the euro area
9. The name is absent
10. Modellgestützte Politikberatung im Naturschutz: Zur „optimalen“ Flächennutzung in der Agrarlandschaft des Biosphärenreservates „Mittlere Elbe“