Table 1. Relationships among Arrow-Pratt risk aversion measures
_____DRRA |
CRRA_____ |
IRRA | |
DARA |
Feasible |
Feasible |
Feasible |
CARA |
Not feasible |
Not feasible |
Feasible |
IARA |
______Not feasible |
Not feasible_____ |
______Feasible______ |
Source: Saha (1997)
Table 2. The conditions imposed on MS function under LS condition
______DRRA |
CRRA |
_____IRRA | |
DARA |
(1)(2)(3-i) (3-ii)(3-iii) |
(1)(2)(3-i)(3-ii)(3-iii) |
(1)(2)(3-i)(3-ii)(3-iii) |
CARA |
Not feasible |
Not feasible |
(1)(2)(3-i)(3-ii)(3-iii) |
IARA |
Not feasible |
Not feasible |
(1)(2)(3-i)(3-ii)(3-iii) |
32
More intriguing information
1. Poverty transition through targeted programme: the case of Bangladesh Poultry Model2. Orientation discrimination in WS 2
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Short- and long-term experience in pulmonary vein segmental ostial ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation*
7. AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PRODUCTION EFFECTS OF ADOPTING GM SEED TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE OF FARMERS IN ARGENTINA
8. Estimating the Impact of Medication on Diabetics' Diet and Lifestyle Choices
9. Regional specialisation in a transition country - Hungary
10. TRADE NEGOTIATIONS AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN AGRICULTURE