Rent-Seeking in Noxious Weed Regulations: Evidence from US States



representing a genus comparison. Most of the spp problems were fixed with our taxonomic
resolution, but in a few cases a state (A) has listed some species within a genus, while the
comparator state (B) has only the genus name. In this case, the number of overlap is set equal to
the number of explicit species in the concerned genus in state A.

Each state’s NXWS list has two components: prohibited and restricted lists. Most states
imposes zero tolerance on the prohibited noxious weed species, while restricted species have
defined tolerance (e.g., number per 100 seeds). Therefore we developed three 48x48 overlap
matrices, one each for prohibited, restricted and the combined (NXWS) lists:

z' AL AL AL AR ...  AL WY y

. WY AL WY AR - WY WY .

48×48

where AL, AR and WY denote Alabama, Arkansas and Wyoming, respectively. The overlap
matrix is symmetric, where each row corresponds to a state’s number of common weed species
with all states (including itself). For example, the first row corresponds to the overlap of
Alabama’s list with itself and all other 47 state lists. Note that the diagonal elements of the
overlap matrix are the number of noxious weeds listed in that state. Since the number of the
noxious weeds listed by each state is different, we calculated percent overlap by dividing the
overlap of noxious weeds in each row by the size of the corresponding state’s list. For instance,
the first row of the 48x48 overlap matrix is divided by the number of noxious weeds listed in
AL. The diagonal elements of the matrix are equal to 1, while off-diagonal elements vary
between 0 and 1 depending on the degree of overlap.

The case of NXW lists is uneven relative to that of the NXWS lists. Some states do not
have a NW list as of 2004 (e.g., Mississippi, New Jersey), while others have NW lists that list the
same weeds in the NXWS list (e.g., Louisiana, Massachusetts). In other cases, the NW list is

11



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. BARRIERS TO EFFICIENCY AND THE PRIVATIZATION OF TOWNSHIP-VILLAGE ENTERPRISES
3. THE INTERNATIONAL OUTLOOK FOR U.S. TOBACCO
4. A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON UNDERINVESTMENT IN AGRICULTURAL R&D
5. Are class size differences related to pupils’ educational progress and classroom processes? Findings from the Institute of Education Class Size Study of children aged 5-7 Years
6. The name is absent
7. The Impact of EU Accession in Romania: An Analysis of Regional Development Policy Effects by a Multiregional I-O Model
8. The Demand for Specialty-Crop Insurance: Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard
9. Why Managers Hold Shares of Their Firms: An Empirical Analysis
10. Output Effects of Agri-environmental Programs of the EU
11. Urban Green Space Policies: Performance and Success Conditions in European Cities
12. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
13. The name is absent
14. Economic Evaluation of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), CHERE Working Paper 2007/6
15. The Context of Sense and Sensibility
16. Nietzsche, immortality, singularity and eternal recurrence1
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. Fortschritte bei der Exportorientierung von Dienstleistungsunternehmen
20. The name is absent