Table 3. Estimates of Cross-State Weed Regulatory Congruence, 2002
|
Slope Coefficients a |
Sign of |
List 1 |
List 2 |
List 3 |
List 4 NW |
|
I1. Average Temperature |
Negative |
6.0192* |
77.9172** |
-22.3952** |
27.6193** |
|
. (3.0452) |
. (4.3315) |
. (3.3327) |
. (5.5819) | ||
|
Positive |
-97.3348** |
-39.7359** |
-86.9851** |
-29.2558** | |
|
(4.5406) |
(7.2631) |
(4.9156) |
(8.3285) | ||
|
I2. Average Precipitation |
Negative |
10.7105** |
6.9771** (0.8961) |
5.4450** (0.6867) |
12.7726** |
|
Positive |
-17.9395** |
-18.6396** |
-28.2771** |
2.0383 | |
|
(1.8217) |
(2.6990) |
(2.0377) |
(3.1967) | ||
|
I3. Variance of Temperature |
Negative |
0 0024 |
-0 0064* |
0 0081* |
-0 0162** |
|
. (0.0035) |
. (0.0037) |
. (0.0041) |
. (0.0060) | ||
|
Positive |
-6.5445** |
-6.7927** |
-6.3753** |
-9.3485** | |
|
(1.5217) |
(2.2661) |
(1.6075) |
(2.4415) | ||
|
I4. Variance of Precipitation |
Negative |
0 0000 |
-0 0000 |
0 0001* |
-0 0001 |
|
. (0.0000) |
. (0.0000) |
. (0.0000) |
. (0.0000) | ||
|
Positive |
-5.6056** |
-18.1827** |
-4.0619* |
-7.5137** | |
|
(1.4838) |
(2.2530) |
(1.5871) |
(2.5831) | ||
|
I5. Land Share Index |
Negative |
0.0280 |
0.0421 |
0.0071 |
-0.1023 |
|
(0.0234) |
(0.0393) |
(0.0218) |
(0.0682) | ||
|
Positive |
0.0213 |
0.0377 |
0.0058 |
0.0230 | |
|
(0.0281) |
(0.0473) |
(0.0263) |
(0.0946) | ||
|
I6. Water Share Index |
Negative |
0 2331 |
0 4933** |
0 1009 |
0 0644 |
|
. (0.1419) |
. (0.1867) |
. (0.1687) |
. (0.4540) | ||
|
Positive |
-0.1704 |
-0.6096* |
-0.0178 |
0.0195 | |
|
(0.1149) |
(0.1544) |
(0.1375) |
(0.3803) | ||
|
I7. Soil Share Index |
Negative |
-0 0481 |
-0 2558 |
0 0787 |
-0 5541 |
|
. (0.1862) |
. (0.2809) |
. (0.2197) |
. (0.3862) | ||
|
Positive |
-0.0186 |
0.4315 |
-0.3601 |
0.1504 | |
|
(0.1613) |
(0.24151) |
(0.1876) |
(0.3390) | ||
|
A1. Field Crop Land Share |
Negative |
4 6134** |
8 9766** |
4 3584** |
5 9742** |
|
. (1.3560) |
. (1.9970) |
. (1.3247) |
. (1.7632) | ||
|
Positive |
-11.9382** |
1.2836 |
-15.6365** |
1.6604 | |
|
(2.5060) |
(3.7752) |
(2.7747) |
(3.9808) | ||
|
A2. Irrigated Land Share |
Negative |
0 0254** |
-0 0297 |
0 0577** |
0 0135 |
|
. (0.0098) |
. (0.0163) |
. (0.0117) |
. (0.0154) | ||
|
Positive |
-5.2458** |
-3.3891 |
-1.2897 |
-4.6188* | |
|
(1.3962) |
(2.0586) |
(1.5069) |
(2.3250) | ||
|
ωc: Lobby of Consumer |
Negative |
-0.0626 |
0.0272 |
-0.0468 |
0.2804 |
|
. (0.0324) |
. (0.0499) |
. (0.0362) |
. (0.1814) | ||
|
Positive |
-3.1981* |
0.4738 |
-0.4750 |
-7.5734** | |
|
(1.5602) |
(2.2480) |
(1.7143) |
(2.5308) | ||
|
ωs: Lobby of Seed Industry |
Negative |
-0.0235 |
-0.0631** |
0.0241 |
-0.0576** |
|
. (0.0158) |
. (0.0218) |
. (0.0178) |
. (0.0190) | ||
|
Positive |
-1.7488 |
-1.6051 |
1.8992 |
3.1139 | |
|
(1.4492) |
(2.1602) |
(1.5447) |
(2.3757) | ||
|
ωm: Lobby of Commodity |
Negative |
0.4684** |
0.2360 |
0.6222** |
-0.7174** |
|
Producer |
(0.1139) |
(0.1649) |
(0.1260) |
(0.2241) | |
|
Positive |
-3.7354* |
7.8416** |
-3.4817* |
-2.8600 | |
|
(1.5426) |
_________(2.3017) |
_________(1.6396) |
(2.5521) |
** and * denote significance at the 1% and 5% level, respectively; number in parenthesis is standard error.
aI1 through I7 indicate ecological dissimilarity indexes, A1 and A2 are agronomic dissimilarity indexes, and ωk,
k=c,s,m, denote lobbying dissimilarity indexes.
29
More intriguing information
1. DEMAND FOR MEAT AND FISH PRODUCTS IN KOREA2. The name is absent
3. The Veblen-Gerschenkron Effect of FDI in Mezzogiorno and East Germany
4. The name is absent
5. LOCAL PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES TO HELP FARM PEOPLE ADJUST
6. An Efficient Circulant MIMO Equalizer for CDMA Downlink: Algorithm and VLSI Architecture
7. The WTO and the Cartagena Protocol: International Policy Coordination or Conflict?
8. Job quality and labour market performance
9. The Environmental Kuznets Curve Under a New framework: Role of Social Capital in Water Pollution
10. The name is absent