Table 2. Estimates of Cross-State Weed Regulatory Congruence, 1997
|
Slope Coefficients a |
Sign of |
List 1 |
List 2 |
List 3 |
List 4 NW |
|
I1. Average Temperature |
Negative |
4.9813 |
84.4727** |
-21.3807** |
6.1407 |
|
. (3.2738) |
. (4.4132) |
. (3.4548) |
. (7.1744) | ||
|
Positive |
-97.3581** |
-42.5648** |
-79.4742** |
-44.4595** | |
|
(4.7132) |
(7.0742) |
(5.0572) |
(9.1408) | ||
|
I2. Average Precipitation |
Negative |
10 5249** |
7 3781** |
5 1682** |
13 8153** |
|
. (0.6986) |
. (0.8859) |
. (0.7147) |
. (1.3309) | ||
|
Positive |
-22.7889** |
-19.4822** |
-32.4031** |
6.8839 | |
|
(1.9501) |
(2.7352) |
(2.1169) |
(3.9889) | ||
|
I3. Variance of Temperature |
Negative |
0 0018 |
-0 0054 |
0 0074 |
-2 6872** |
|
. (0.0037) |
. (0.0038) |
. (0.0040) |
. (0.5272) | ||
|
Positive |
-6.9931** |
-4.6264* |
-6.1663** |
-11.0265** | |
|
(1.5677) |
(2.2303) |
(1.6542) |
(2.6504) | ||
|
I4. Variance of Precipitation |
Negative |
0 0001* |
-0 0000 |
0 0001** |
-0 0250* |
|
. (0.0000) |
. (0.0000) |
. (0.0000) |
. (0.0114) | ||
|
Positive |
-6.64113** |
-16.6602** |
-5.91907** |
-8.7547** | |
|
(1.51491) |
(2.17302) |
(1.59267) |
(2.89615) | ||
|
I5. Land Share Index |
Negative |
0.0377 |
0.0294 |
0.0122 |
0.0368 |
|
(0.0245) |
(0.0358) |
(0.0229) |
(0.0189) | ||
|
Positive |
-0.0057 |
0.0581 |
-0.0163 |
-0.0665* | |
|
(0.0293) |
(0.0430) |
(0.0274) |
(0.0334) | ||
|
I6. Water Share Index |
Negative |
0 2186 |
0 3907* |
0 1230 |
0 3155 |
|
. (0.1413) |
. (0.1844) |
. (0.1629) |
. (0.4434) | ||
|
Positive |
-0.2210 |
-0.6354** |
-0.1177 |
-0.3793 | |
|
(0.1140) |
(0.1531) |
(0.1319) |
(0.3691) | ||
|
I7. Soil Share Index |
Negative |
0 0203 |
-0 2286 |
0 1888 |
-0 7390 |
|
. (0.1952) |
. (0.2656) |
. (0.2135) |
. (0.4173) | ||
|
Positive |
-0.0570 |
0.4465 |
-0.3991* |
0.1713 | |
|
(0.1679) |
(0.2289) |
(0.1816) |
(0.3871) | ||
|
A1. Field Crop Land Share |
Negative |
3 8381** |
7 9762** |
4 8898** |
2 9998 |
|
. (1.4170) |
. (1.9874) |
. (1.4321) |
. (1.9787) | ||
|
Positive |
-13.3076** |
1.0805 |
-15.4310** |
-18.7375** | |
|
(2.6138) |
(3.7531) |
(2.8232) |
(4.3266) | ||
|
A2. Irrigated Land Share |
Negative |
0 0151 |
-0 0455** |
0 0631** |
0 0287 |
|
. (0.0122) |
. (0.0176) |
. (0.0131) |
. (0.0183) | ||
|
Positive |
-6.8743** |
-3.6522 |
-3.6564* |
-5.2978* | |
|
(1.4686) |
(2.0594) |
(1.5625) |
(2.5443) | ||
|
ωc: Lobby of Consumer |
Negative |
0.0230 |
0.0107 |
0.3081** |
-0.3546** |
|
. (0.0697) |
. (0.0913) |
. (0.0834) |
. (0.1143) | ||
|
Positive |
-5.6111** |
-2.9029 |
-4.0133* |
0.6874 | |
|
(1.6113) |
(2.2071) |
(1.6983) |
(2.7670) | ||
|
ωs: Lobby of Seed Industry |
Negative |
-0.0387 |
0.0162 |
-0.0436 |
0.0465 |
|
. (0.0259) |
. (0.0306) |
. (0.0294) |
. (0.0588) | ||
|
Positive |
-0.0484 |
2.1991 |
1.5123 |
-3.69253 | |
|
(1.4357) |
(2.0100) |
(1.5100) |
(2.4161) | ||
|
ωm: Lobby of Commodity |
Negative |
0.0708 |
-0.1074 |
0.2051* |
-0.5762** |
|
Producer |
(0.0764) |
(0.0902) |
(0.0828) |
(0.1407) | |
|
Positive |
0.3841 |
0.3476 |
-0.6256 |
1.9280* | |
|
(0.5914) |
_________(0.7400) |
_________(0.6747) |
(0.9482) |
** and * denote significance at the 1% and 5% level, respectively; number in parenthesis is standard error.
aI1 through I7 indicate ecological dissimilarity indexes, A1 and A2 are agronomic dissimilarity indexes, and ωk,
k=c,s,m, denote lobbying dissimilarity indexes.
28
More intriguing information
1. Fighting windmills? EU industrial interests and global climate negotiations2. MULTIMODAL SEMIOTICS OF SPIRITUAL EXPERIENCES: REPRESENTING BELIEFS, METAPHORS, AND ACTIONS
3. Literary criticism as such can perhaps be called the art of rereading.
4. The name is absent
5. Olfactory Neuroblastoma: Diagnostic Difficulty
6. The Variable-Rate Decision for Multiple Inputs with Multiple Management Zones
7. The name is absent
8. An alternative way to model merit good arguments
9. Dynamic Explanations of Industry Structure and Performance
10. The name is absent