Using Surveys Effectively: What are Impact Surveys?



MAKE THE MOST OF YOUR FINDINGS


Summary

Box 4 gives some useful Do’s and Don’ts
which might help in the planning, and
also the assessment, of your impact
survey.


BOX 4 DO’S AND DON’TS OF IMPACT SURVEYS


DON’T be tempted to make an
impact survey your first IA exercise

DO start by using other tools first

DON’T try to answer all the issues
related to impact that you can
think of

DO be very clear about your
objectives and make sure they are
realistic

DON’T undertake an impact survey if
you are mainly interested in a simple
profile of your client’s characteristics
or satisfaction with your services

DO check whether you can get the
information from simpler methods

DON’T collect information you
already have elsewhere

DO look at what information you
already have in your MIS

DON’T settle for poor quality data

DO be rigorous about data collection
including adequate training,
supervision and motivation

DON’T assume tools like the
AIMS/SEEP model can be applied
without adapting them to your MFI’s
situation

DO devote sufficient time to adapting
AIMS/SEEP or other tools to your
context and needs

DON’T get held up at the analysis
stage because of poor planning or
lack of skills

DO ensure you have sufficient skills
on board and carry out trial analyses
at the testing stage

DON’T jump to conclusions in your
interpretation of results

DO triangulate findings with results
from other tools and consider all
possible interpretations


Resources


Nelson, C. (ed.), 2000,
Learning from Clients, Assessment Tools
for Microfinance Practitioners
,
Washington, D.C.: SEEP/AIMS

Mosley, P. 1998,

The Use of Control Groups in Impact
Assessments for Microfinance
,
Geneva: International Labour Office
Social Finance Unit

Roche, C. 1999,
Impact Assessment for Development

Agencies: Learning to Value Change,
Oxford: Oxfam

Hulme, D. 1997,

Impact Assessment Methodologies for
Microfinance: A Review
,
Washington, D.C.: AIMS

Kirkpatrick et al, 2001,

Basic Impact Assessment at Project
Level
,

Manchester: EDIAIS.

Other related Imp-Act Practice Notes
(available from Imp-Act secretariat or
website):

1. The Feedback Loop: Responding to
client needs

2. QUIP: Understanding clients through
in-depth interviews

3. Learning from client exit

5. Choosing and using indicators
for effective social performance
management

PAGE EIGHT IM P-ACT PRACTICE NOTES NUMBER FOUR 2005



More intriguing information

1. Ruptures in the probability scale. Calculation of ruptures’ values
2. ROBUST CLASSIFICATION WITH CONTEXT-SENSITIVE FEATURES
3. Synchronisation and Differentiation: Two Stages of Coordinative Structure
4. Educational Inequalities Among School Leavers in Ireland 1979-1994
5. The name is absent
6. Comparative study of hatching rates of African catfish (Clarias gariepinus Burchell 1822) eggs on different substrates
7. The name is absent
8. Fertility in Developing Countries
9. he Virtual Playground: an Educational Virtual Reality Environment for Evaluating Interactivity and Conceptual Learning
10. Synthesis and biological activity of α-galactosyl ceramide KRN7000 and galactosyl (α1→2) galactosyl ceramide
11. SAEA EDITOR'S REPORT, FEBRUARY 1988
12. INTERACTION EFFECTS OF PROMOTION, RESEARCH, AND PRICE SUPPORT PROGRAMS FOR U.S. COTTON
13. Correlates of Alcoholic Blackout Experience
14. The name is absent
15. The name is absent
16. Industrial Employment Growth in Spanish Regions - the Role Played by Size, Innovation, and Spatial Aspects
17. Higher education funding reforms in England: the distributional effects and the shifting balance of costs
18. Infrastructure Investment in Network Industries: The Role of Incentive Regulation and Regulatory Independence
19. A Location Game On Disjoint Circles
20. Temporary Work in Turbulent Times: The Swedish Experience