212
Table 7.8: Crop yield growth rates, commercial farms sector (percent)
Farm size | ||||||
1975-1989 |
1983-1989 | |||||
Small |
Medium |
Large |
Small |
Medium |
Large | |
Northwest region ' | ||||||
Maize |
2.7 |
-2.5 |
3.7* |
9.9* |
-1.5 |
6.1 |
Wheat' |
-10.0 |
11.6 |
28.9° |
124.2 |
36.6 |
-6.0 |
Tobacco |
.6 |
-1.0 |
-4.7 |
7.0 |
-3.8 |
-16.2 |
Sunflower' |
1.4 |
3.4 |
-8.9° |
10.2 |
6.5 | |
Soybean |
-4.7 |
- .7 |
5.9 |
-16.2 ’ |
-7.4 |
1.3 |
Seed maize" |
16.4" |
10.0 |
-14.2 |
-29.8° |
20.7 |
2.3 |
Potato |
-6.9 |
36.8 |
10.6 |
-43.9 |
34.9 |
15.6 |
Cotton' |
-12.2 |
-20.0° |
-19.7 |
-22.7 | ||
Coffee' |
589.5 |
8.8 |
-56.2 |
589.5 |
8.8 |
-56.2 |
Burley tobacco' |
-.7 |
-.8 |
.0 |
-2.0 |
-9.1 | |
Southeast region` | ||||||
Maize |
.2 |
.3 |
3.8* |
8.6 |
3.2 |
11.2 |
Wheat |
2.9 |
.1 |
-1.6 |
-6.9 |
5.1 |
-6.5 |
Tobacco |
-1.3 |
3.0 |
6.0"’ |
-17.0 |
-1.2 |
1.2 |
Sunflower |
2.5* |
2.8 |
.1 |
* 10.4* |
-.7 |
-3.4 |
Soybean |
-4.1 |
5.4 |
-2.4 |
-8.4 |
-2.5 |
-9.9 |
Seed maize" |
9.4 |
.2 |
.5 |
4.7 |
5.9 |
24.3 |
Potato |
-5.2 |
11.3 |
13.6 |
-32.2 |
-27.6 |
-25.1 |
Cotton |
4.7’ |
-0.1 |
1.2 |
22.9* |
-2.2 |
6.9 |
Coffee' |
279.6 |
13.1 |
279.6 |
13.1 | ||
Burley |
21.4 |
-3.3 |
5.2 |
83.3 |
48.2 |
25.0 |
* The estimate of B in the regressions is significant at the 10 percent level.
** The estimate of B in the regressions is significant at the 5 percent level.
a. Yields derived from area and production data. Years with missing data on a particular crop/region combination were
excluded.
b. Includes Western, Northwestern, and Copperbelt, but not Luapula and Northern provinces.
c. Includes Central, Eastern, Lusaka, and Southern provinces.
d. Data exist for the following crops/regions/farm sizes in the listed years only: wheat/northwest/small (1982, 86-90);
sunflower/northwest/large (1975, 80-82, 88); seedmaize/northwest/small (1976-79, 81, 85-87, 89),
seedmaize/southeast/small (1975-81, 84, 86-87,89); cotton/northwest/medium (1982-83, 86-87); coffee/northwest/small
(1987-88), coffee/northwest/medium and large (1986-88), coffee/southeast/medium (1989-90), coffee/southeast/large
(1986-88), burley tobacco/northwest/small (1980-85), burley tobacco/northwest/medium (1980, 89), burley
tobacco/northwest/large (1979, 82-85, 89), burley tobacco/southeast/small (1979-80, 84, 89), burley
tobacco/southeast/medium (1979, 82-84, 89), burley tobacco/southeast/large (1979-80, 85, 88-90).
Source: Derived from Zambia CSO data.
More intriguing information
1. Plasmid-Encoded Multidrug Resistance of Salmonella typhi and some Enteric Bacteria in and around Kolkata, India: A Preliminary Study2. Empirical Calibration of a Least-Cost Conservation Reserve Program
3. A MARKOVIAN APPROXIMATED SOLUTION TO A PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT PROBLEM
4. The name is absent
5. A Dynamic Model of Conflict and Cooperation
6. How do investors' expectations drive asset prices?
7. On the Existence of the Moments of the Asymptotic Trace Statistic
8. The Dynamic Cost of the Draft
9. Assessing Economic Complexity with Input-Output Based Measures
10. A model-free approach to delta hedging