216
Table 7.9: Production growth rates, 1972 to 1986, noncommercial farms sector
|
Copperbelt/ |
Central/ |
Northern/ |
Eastern |
Western | |
|
Beans |
-.009 |
-.066 |
-.042 |
.049 |
-.038 |
|
Cassava |
.015 |
-.208' |
-.013 |
-.109 |
-.042 |
|
Groundnuts |
-.013 |
-.118" |
-.074" |
-.060" |
-.039 |
|
Maize |
.010 |
.013 |
-.065" |
-.063" |
-.052" |
|
Millet |
-.063' |
-.021 |
-.046' |
-.022 |
-.022 |
|
Sorghum |
.011 |
-.043 |
-.027 |
-.001 |
.036 |
* The estimate of B in the regressions is significant at the 10 percent level.
**The estimate of B in the regressions is significant at the 5 percent level.
Source: Derived from Zambia CSO data.
Figure 7.6: Zambia cereals production (thousand metric tons)
Source: ERS.
More intriguing information
1. Who runs the IFIs?2. Strategic Policy Options to Improve Irrigation Water Allocation Efficiency: Analysis on Egypt and Morocco
3. Testing Panel Data Regression Models with Spatial Error Correlation
4. Testing for One-Factor Models versus Stochastic Volatility Models
5. The Economics of Uncovered Interest Parity Condition for Emerging Markets: A Survey
6. The name is absent
7. The Prohibition of the Proposed Springer-ProSiebenSat.1-Merger: How much Economics in German Merger Control?
8. Human Resource Management Practices and Wage Dispersion in U.S. Establishments
9. The Dictator and the Parties A Study on Policy Co-operation in Mineral Economies
10. The Role of Land Retirement Programs for Management of Water Resources