216
Table 7.9: Production growth rates, 1972 to 1986, noncommercial farms sector
|
Copperbelt/ |
Central/ |
Northern/ |
Eastern |
Western | |
|
Beans |
-.009 |
-.066 |
-.042 |
.049 |
-.038 |
|
Cassava |
.015 |
-.208' |
-.013 |
-.109 |
-.042 |
|
Groundnuts |
-.013 |
-.118" |
-.074" |
-.060" |
-.039 |
|
Maize |
.010 |
.013 |
-.065" |
-.063" |
-.052" |
|
Millet |
-.063' |
-.021 |
-.046' |
-.022 |
-.022 |
|
Sorghum |
.011 |
-.043 |
-.027 |
-.001 |
.036 |
* The estimate of B in the regressions is significant at the 10 percent level.
**The estimate of B in the regressions is significant at the 5 percent level.
Source: Derived from Zambia CSO data.
Figure 7.6: Zambia cereals production (thousand metric tons)
Source: ERS.
More intriguing information
1. Lending to Agribusinesses in Zambia2. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. CONSUMER PERCEPTION ON ALTERNATIVE POULTRY
6. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
7. Forecasting Financial Crises and Contagion in Asia using Dynamic Factor Analysis
8. Does Presenting Patients’ BMI Increase Documentation of Obesity?
9. The Role of Land Retirement Programs for Management of Water Resources
10. The name is absent